1ºIt should have worked out. They couldn't find any way to keep him in a bubble during the tournament?! It's tennis, so on the court there should have been no problem because the players are far enough away from each other. Even in doubles, it's more than 6' most of the time, and most people are vaccinated so they shouldn't even be afraid of contracting it. Mr. Djokovic could agree to wear a hazmat suit whenever off the court and outside his hotel room, just so he could play. As it is, the tournament won't be right. It will be remembered for this, when the defending champion, a man who was cheered by the crowds with multiple Australian Open titles, is "deported" because his unique approach to being at his best meant not putting anything like the vaccine in his body.
2ºAustralia could only be a warning to Djokovic, a warning balloon to get vaccinated, to join the herd and bow his head, or he will no longer play and not only lose his number one position on the ATP rankings, but also lose his entire career. This is just the beginning of the struggle between globalists and vocal opponents of Total Control. When they subordinate the world number one as a criminal and deport him from the grand slam, then don't be surprised that bullying and oppression will escalate. Big noses knows no exceptions, whether it is a little schoolboy or a world tennis legend, and even more of Slavic origin, which is literally like a red canvas for a globalist.
3ºThe best player in the world at this moment wont be able to compete because some rules about what he did before going to Australia and because he lied. Laws that are intended to protect people, were absolute useless on Djokovici medical condition, because he had covid and he was tested. Yes, trying to ignore the rules was bad, no matter that those rules are unfair, considering he was not much of a threat to spread the desease. In my opinion Djokovici was wrong lying, but also those australian rules feel very wrong and need to be changed. Sadly, Australian Open it's not a competition about sport excellence this year.
4ºIt seems people forgot what happened with the swine flu jab 3 years after rollout, it takes 10 years to know if a vaccine is safe long term…and people want to get onto him for not taking it…while sports men and women are dropping like flies…I don’t blame him…stand your ground
1 in 55,000 developed narcolepsy the last time we rolled out a vax at this speed and we’ve just injected over 9 billion doses with the possible effect of myocarditis and blood clots…common sense people….as the habitual criminals state it to be “rare” we’ll still see a significant amount of people developing it…and these Are people who are testing a negative for covid. Because of this people should be allowed to choose and not be subject to discrimination or bias.
The public health risk as been a lie. Nothing but political pseudo science. The vaccine doesn’t give enough immunisation to prevent you spreading the virus…even if you vaccinate the whole population as there has been you’ll still see high cases that disrupts and cause an economical and social impact disproportionate to the threat we’re safe guarding from.
5ºFacts:
1. All covid-19 injections are still in Phase 3 clinical trials until 2023.
2. None of coronavirus injections passed animal trials in the last more than 17 years.
3. Covid-19 injections are using gene therapy which means it involves deleting your genes. For example, deletion if gene 144 results in rapid cancer growth.
4. FDA started to add back warning labels regarding heart problems such as myocarditis. There is a study which shows how produced antibodies cross react with 28 human tissues.
5. None of vaccines manufacturers are liable for their products since 1986 and vaccine injuries have been compensated (if you are are lucky, only 5-10% of all claims, depending on a country) using taxpayer money.
6ºI am only half vaccinated due to an adverse reaction to Pfizer dose #1. I have personally felt the stigma of the pro-vaccine nation. Even my OWN FAMILY members and closest friends did not show any mercy for my vaccine-induced illness woes, they did not want to hear it, did not believe me, and bullied me. I have had to plead my case not to lose my job as a healthcare interfaith hospice chaplain. I HAVE NEVER seen such a strange display of human behavior in my life, and it terrifies me. All this over a vaccine that is not even effective at stopping transmission, and never had a chance at stopping Covid. Granted the anti-vaxxer extremists caused this pro-vaccine extremism but two wrongs result in an over-correction that leads to pro-vaccine terrorism. History is going to have fun with this one!
7ºI have doubts about the judgment and an important question. Was the Australian court objective?
Was N. Djokovic's antibody tested for convalescence after the disease?
Usually, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies persist and are detected for several months after the infection has worn off. Their presence may indicate contact with the virus.
Novak Djokovic was infected with COVID-19 in December and, on this basis, he was released from the obligation to vaccinate before arriving in Australia, Serb lawyers said in a document filed with the court. How did the court judge he was not infected? Were there any tests for antibodies after falling ill?
As we know, many people in the world, despite being infected and falling ill with Sars Cov2 - Covid-19, do not observe quarantine. Failure to comply with quarantine is not the same as antibodies that will make it clear about Covid-19 disease.
8º“Djokovic lost because the law was designed to make the Minister’s decisions immune from judicial review. That is not a good thing.” The judge essentially said that the court cannot overrule the decision of the executive branch. This isn’t a democracy. It’s a farce. They wanted to make an example out of Djokovic, and they did. Deported him not based on any facts, but that he “may incite anti-vax sentiments.”
“Your views on Djokovic aside, no government minister should have the sole power to either deport or detain an individual.
Checks and balances between executive, legislative and judicial branches are how democracies work. When the executive overrides all, democracy falters.”
The case shows a lot of hypocrisy, because most people wouldn’t be ok with one man having the power to overrule courts, but because it’s Novak, it’s ok.
9ºBut I thought Vaccination is not complusory,it's personal choice.If Djokovic didn't get the Jab it was his choice and if Australia didn't want athletes who are not vaccinated and they passed it with in their laws,then why did they accept him in the country, could there be some kind of foul play in this!!
Credit still goes to Djokovic for standing by his word/ making his own choice of not taking jab.what does he loose if he doesn't partcipate in the event.Lets accept Djokovic is a brand so it's the event that stands to loose out if he isn't in.
10ºDjokovic your people around you are incompetent unqualified to protect you
If you made the decision to go to Australia without being vaccinated it’s your fault
You have very bad judgement
You went from being liked by everyone to having very little fans
Now when you go back home - think buddy
Either get vaccinated to stop the coronavirus pandemic
Or stay home in Serbia and enjoy your retirement because this coronavirus is here till 2025 or 2026
Because of people like you who donor get vaccinated
It’s your fault
Dah!
One good thing
Djokovic LaCosta tennis outfits will be going insane 75% off