1ºIt's not labeling falsely if of it's true. You do know most of what you mentioned are continuing programs under previous administrations? Obviously you never noticed bridges and highways being worked on before.Job rate? Best employment? Why did Obama say it'll take a magic wand to bring jobs back then if he already had?
Well, Republicans brought on Clarence Thomas to the court and had a black woman to come on board to a high court but Biden blocked it and threatened filibuster if she was nominated,she likely would have been picked for the Supreme Court but Democrats blocked a highly qualified black woman from obtaining that seat. Parks back,you mean after Obama shut them down? Military readiness was low under that administration. Wages are going up because of trying to lure workers back, staying at home was better than that because of extended unemployment checks,it beat actually working for a check.
Indigenous rights work has been going on for decades,my ex's aunt works for the Creek nation in D.C. and has for decades so I know a bit about that.
I'm guessing you think also inflation is good and oil companies can start drilling in days instead of doing the pesky geologic surveys, environmental impact studies,ect.
Ok,can I lump sum both liberals and leftists into one category then?
I vote both sides but year after year democrats have made it harder to do so with rhetoric and pandering.
Democrat cities should be utopias by now after decades under their control instead of getting worse, going to brag about that or point the finger at someone else as always?
Enjoy your inflation you wanted and voted for...pass,hint, inflation dips into those higher wages big time don't ya know..... wait,you don't,my bad.
2ºWill she even remember defending it or that she does it in the 1st place since she seems to be forgetting more and more? Funny how we start removing people from the workforc in their seventies due to reduced functions physically and mentally starting to decline but having someone over 80 sitting in Congress that is clearly having that decline seems perfectly acceptable to many people.
"Rather than delve into policy, Feinstein, 88, repeated the same small-talk questions, like asking the lawmaker what mattered to voters in their district, the member of Congress said, with no apparent recognition the two had already had a similar conversation."
https://www.sfchronicle.c...te-17079487.php
3ºDavid Cook You got the labels fella. What the hell is a leftist LOL? Are you mistaking us Libtards for leftists because you like labels. Actually I am quite moderate in political thought. BTW... the Dems did deliver the goods. Got the U.S. out of the scourge, best GPD growth in 40 years, best employment in many years, wages going up, got our national parks back, women's rights, indigenous rights, 40 solid judges appointed, finally going to get our bridges and Interstate highways fixed, and along the way got a Black VP and and the first Black member of the Supreme Court. Why don't you compare that to the last administration?
4ºJacob Wischmeier Any senator and (in your face) corruption go together. Senates should all be abolished. High chambers (senates) are, by definition, places where you can laugh at the lower chambers (houses). Guess why the ancient roman senate is the model for modern day senates? Because roman senators were corrupt financially and sexually. Senate and (in your face) corruption go together: a fix and small number of senators by region (rich or poor, big or small) is the perfect recipe for corrupting democracy. Your Senate should also be abolished. Fifteen small states with 38 million people combined routinely elect 30 GOP senators; California, with 40 million residents, is represented by two Democrats. This imbalance is getting worse: By 2040, roughly 70 percent of Americans will live in 15 states with 30 senators, while the other 30 percent, who are whiter, older, and more rural than the country as a whole, will elect 70 senators.