1ºTricia Phillip Gronnevik and yet the government will take kids, slap an m4, or better yet, an m249 machine gun (ACTUAL weapons of war) in their hands and send them to war before they're old enough to buy a beer, while at the same time wanting to lower the voting age to 16, and let them be younger still to make drastic life altering decisions about their gender
Spend an entire summer rioting over police brutality and out of control racist cops, and now not long after wanting gun bans and having only the cops and government with the guns, when multiple times now we have seen we cannot rely on the cops to protect people, on top of them having no duty to protect anyone per the scotus....
2ºRay Contreras funny, my AR sits around collecting dust, despite having a healthy (or unhealthy I'm sure you would say) supply of ammo for it, as I can't bring myself to pay $22 for day pass to the local range when I'd be there probably an hour at most, or burn the gas to drive an hour to my family's rural home to pop off some rounds, on top of cost to replenish the ammo used... sure seems like it get along great in society
These psychos have a problem in the head. If they can't get what they want to do what they've set out to do, they'll find another way. Let's say he couldn't get any ars, what's to say he wouldn't have gotten a mini14? Same caliber, detachable mags, similar capabilities, but it's not a big scary black "military style" rifle (even though it's the civilian model of the old m14)... what's to say he wouldn't have just plowed his truck through the kids after school was out and they were all outside waiting for the buses?
3ºThese officers made a choice, as men, to remain inactive and stand by while... well we all know what happened. Not one stepped up. All passed the buck, all had excuses. All ran back and took cover... now consider how ONE man ended the shooting at the mall in Indiana.
If we allow (change the law) that police officers, and officers, can be sued independently and individually - separate of the city, and their agency, then they may think twice about their legacy, and about their actions - and in this situation their inactions.
These survivors' families should take action, and test the limits of litigation and go after everyone from the principal, to the school association, to the town and city, to the city officials - individually, to the police department... and then maybe we will see the beginning of change.
4ºBruce Ford The solution would be to demand that the government reinstate police officers duty to protect. Was that too hard to understand? Without that duty to protect They are nothing but enforcers with only a few exceptions that would be known as still good cops. The law does not back good cops though but it backs bad officers plenty. Go ahead and think that your few exceptions that are still good officers are going to do much overall against the mass majority of bad officers that the law protects. The more the law protects bad officers the more bad officers we will have
5ºBruce Ford Go ahead and fire him. I agree with that. it still does nothing to address that police have no constitutional duty or otherwise to protect citizens by government ruling. Until police have their duty to protect reinstated what good are they other than as enforcers for the city's end States for which they work? Even during the parkland shooting in 2018 an officer stood outside and did nothing wealthy shooter was active and he was at 1st removed from his job but he later got it back with back pay because of the government ruling that he did not have a constitutional duty or otherwise for otherwise to protect and serve. You say they serve the people but currently by government ruling they really don't Or are at least not required to
https://www.nytimes.com/2...to-protect.html
6ºBruce Ford I can agree that you definitely have some good points. I just don't feel it fully addresses that's a government ruled police have no duty to protect. There are plenty of officers still who are willing to protect but how many officers have left their jobs in the last few years? how many more got pushed out of their their jobs for other reasons including vaccines? Unfortunately these have not left us with a majority of good cops in probability. When the law protects bad cops over good cops then More good cops will get punished for silly things and pushed out. Unfortunately this kind of thing has happened in history quite a few times. Not Always but usually it continues to happen for a while and then The government will call police incompetent or lacking and start a government ran police force Creating a police state. I really hope we are not watching something like that happen in the making. Police States are much easier to have when populaces are disarmed and much of the government is also talking about trying to remove firearms from citizens. It might not be related but there is also unfortunate chance that it all could be. JFK did warn before his assassination tnation that multiple political sides were coming together in a plot to enslave the American people. I have to wonder if we are seeing the frustration of that plot happened today especially when there are so many old members of Congress Congress including Nancy Pelosi who was in her early twenties when JFK was inaugurated. Did those in Congress that have been in there that long avoid that plot or did they become part of that plot? Right now we have no solid clue though And some would call it conspiracy theory. In either case either everything might be connected or it might not
7ºI see that ammocentric gun nuts are praising a “good guy with a gun” who stopped a mass shooting in progress at a mall in Indiana… but that was after a shooter killed three people and injured three others before the “good guy with a gun” took him out. The “bad guy with a gun” got off 20 shots before the “good guy with a gun” took him down. This “good guy with a gun” probably saved lives… but is this the system we want for gun safety? Do we really want more people with guns? Republicans and the NRA say yes.
Gun nuts have already made it clear that dozens of dead children are a price they’re willing to pay for their right to own assault rifles. And with this latest incident, they’re surely going to celebrate that only three people died. But wouldn’t it be better if no one died? Can we live with mass shootings if only three people die at each? If so, we have some very low standards and a lack of appreciation for life.
We wouldn’t need protection from bad guys with guns from good guys with guns if perhaps no bad guys had guns.
Carnage from mass shootings as a regular occurrence is unique to the USA… when we compare our lax gun laws and the lack of action by lawmakers tragedy after tragedy it is obvious to conclude that in the USA our wounds are self-inflicted.
We need to elect people who are not puppets of the gun lobby who are more concerned about protecting the public than their “NRA scorecard.”
8ºArredondo = cobarde
Laredo es una
Dando recomendaciones
Apoyando y sobretodo del mismo equipo de Laredo..
Que solo se Salva a el mismo...
Hay un caso en Laredo
Una mujer fue a pedir food stamps con sus 2 hijos(hijas)
Y se lo negaron como Buenos perros que son en esa oficina..
La mujer se atrinchero con los hijos y demas..
Y No hicieron nada por ayudar
Se mato y mato a sus 2 hijos...
Una mujer que solo fue a pedir comida...
Y todavia lo peor uno de los empleados de esa oficina escribio un libro de su experiencia para generar ganancias segun comentan..
Asi es Laredo