1ºLori Wilson in what way was she a roll model. What precisely did she do to be a roll model that others before haven’t? Like Billy Jean for example, or Martina.
The Compton scam was already a bust, her brutal father had money he just made them live in Compton, most of his money probably went to the Watchtower Society. No one talks about that and him dragging the kids door to door Jehovah Witnessing. She doesn’t represent America as JW’s do not do that either, again besides just being a good tennis player, a very good one surely one of the best, and a woman of color what did she do. She can only be friends with and associate with fellow JW’s, that’s their rule, so maybe she’s a roll model to them, I could get that. Is that what you mean she’s a roll model for JW’s?
2ºPaulette Molasses Sims no sje isn't. Do you follow baseball ? Graff v serena is excatly the same as gwynn 3100 hits v rose 4200 hits . Not a single expert rates rose a greater hitter than gynn despite having 25% more hits ,because gwynns batting average of 338 is way better than roses 303. Similarly graff with 22 slams is greater than serena with 23 slams because graffs " batting average "of winning 2 grand slams championships a year ( 22 in 12 years ) is twice as good as serenas average if winning 1 grand slam championship a year ( 23 in 21 years ) . In addition graff had 70 more weeks at no 1 than serena despite 9 less years on the pro tour . Its not even close.
If you insist that serena is greater simply because of 23 slams v graff a 22 then by that standard its court as the goat wirh 24 . So no matter wjat criterion you use serena isnt the goat ,shes top 5 though