1ºNick Deuel Can you confirm whether you meant “I found arguments for both sides for whether Tate is a violent misogynist” when you said, “I found arguments for both sides”? I didn’t know there can be two sides to this argument when, as you mentioned, the assault on the Big Brother show is widely available; when what he said on various podcasts about his views on women in terms of property, SA, and rights are easily available (refer to my first reply to ur original comment); and when his views directly demean women. These are hard facts that cannot be denied and events that cannot be interpreted any other way. I cannot possibly imagine how there can be another side to the argument of whether he is a violent misogynist after reading the above-mentioned facts. If you don’t understand what I’m saying, lemme give you an example. Chris Brown is a violent woman beater. The evidence is the very public court cases/police reports. There’s no other side to that argument. Based on the prior mentioned facts and quotes, he is a violent misogynist. Not that hard.
2ºBecky Witt also, as for “ownership”. He doesn’t say he owns his women. He simply understands that in most relationships in most parts of the world, the man is responsible for his family’s safety. If someone broke into your house who’s going to fight the attacker, you or your husband? Probably your husband. If you are walking down the street and someone snatched your purse you will expect your husband to risk his life going after the guy. So if a man has to risk his life protecting you, he should have SOME say in what situations you put yourself. I personally do not like my gf hanging out late at night unless I’m with her because if something happened to her id feel responsible.
3ºErika Marie the fact that hours later.. the Karen inside of you couldn’t walk away without the last word…so you popped back on this post after spending time on my page becoming a fan (thank you by the way) just to get the last word let’s me know… you got dropped and broken somewhere in this thing called life and never healed. Fix that in 2023 because the world is never going to 100 percent agree with you and you need to learn how to be okay with it. Btw.. Don’t let me read you again. It’s embarrassing. Happy New Year.
4ºBill E. DeMille . Thanks for doing exactly what I said you would . Proving my point that when hit with a fact you don't like you get mad and cry but never actually try and prove the stated fact wrong. It's comical especially since I already knew what you were gonna do before you even did it. Thanks for the laughs. I'm gonna go back to work but I'll check back later and see if you just spewed more dribble or if you actually attempted to prove me wrong somehow. As long as you don't prove me wrong you are are just crying.
5ºAnd as the year draws to a close, it looks like Elon Musk has narrowly beaten Liz Truss to claim the title of most embarrassed person of 2022 at the end of Decem- BY GOD HERE HE COMES DOWN THE RAMP! IT’S ANDREW TATE WITH A STEEL CHAIR So he was detained for possibly being involved with human trafficking? Am I reading this right? He probably got called Andrew Taint growing up, so that’s why he hates the world so much. Pro-tip. Stuff like this is EXACTLY why you shouldn't engage in social media spats. Some folks clearly just aren't good at it. Love it! Prosecute him TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW FOR THE HORRORS he’s inflicted on women!!!
THANK YOU GRETA!!!!️ Given that the evidence against him is flimsy, the arrest was just likely a plot towards a shakedown by corrupt security officials in that Eastern European country. I wish he was free he makes twitter a really nice and fun place he and Kanye west
6ºKhalid Khalid I did Google it. I found arguments for both sides. I found that the big brother incident had more to it. As did many of the other snippets people tend to quote so I didn’t know quite what to believe. And while I disagree with a lot of what he says and does I have yet to hear or find anything of him calling for violence to women, nothing of him saying men and boys out there should beat or mistreat women so I thought I would ask.
And the fact that we are in the age of the fact check I didn’t think I was so far out of line.
7ºNick Deuel if you really wanted evidence, why didn’t you Google first? You’re the one seeking proof and so, you bear the primary responsibility. Instead of “delegating” that task to others and bringing nothing to the plate, why don’t u do ur findings first and then, request clarifications? You certainly wouldn’t go to your boss and say, “Idk how to do this”. You would first try to do it yourself and then you’ll say, “I tried X and Y happened bcuz of it. I need more help to do this task.” If you’re not bringing anything to the table, you’re not trying to have a conversation. You’re simply demanding answers and being lazy. As you mentioned just now, you found both sides of the argument and wasn’t sure. Your bare minimum responsibility is to show how you were unable to find a clear proof. If you didn’t think of doing that/if you don’t do that on a regular basis, I’m sorry, you’re not pulling your weight in the conversation and thereby, wasting everyone’s time and space on the internet.
8ºZel Afewerk innocent until proven guilty is a united States legal principle. It doesn't necessarily extend everywhere, and it is not an objective truth.
Of course someone who does a crime is objectively guilty even before they have been proven guilty. You don't become more guilty after someone proves it. You were guilty the whole time. The US takes the stance that we are innocent until proven guilty, but that's not how it works everywhere. And here on facebook, we are not bound by the presumption of innocence because we are not a jury. Public opinion looks at the facts as they become available and makes their choice, which sometimes changes.
9ºThe manner of his arrest is suspect. It's more cognizant with a shakedown than a genuine search for justice for these reasons -
1. He could easily have been summoned to the police station
2. He is High profile and therefore not really a flight risk. His entry into the country was documented. More so even if he left, Romania has diplomatic relations with the and and can pursue his extradition or trial through INTERPOL etc
3. He had actually publicly addressed these allegations of kidnapping. I did abit of reseach on them but it's more like a "He said, she said case" and the evidence seemed frivolous.
The only reason for such an arrest was to "shake him down" as he negotiates his bail terms more than they would do if he was free. Romania is known for corruption so this is highly probable. If this was not the case he would not have been released so quickly.
10ºSamuel Turnberg The truth sucks man a lot of people in Hollywood are just like Michael Jackson. There's a reason we will never know the names Of the powerful people that were on Epstein's island other than the allegations of Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, ect. Back to Michael Jackson, If that man wasn't doing f***** u* s*** with little kids in his neverland place why did he have literal pressure plates installed in the floors which were rigged to an alarm system in his room which tells him when someone is coming down the hall. This was all found and documented by police. And then you have people that come out and say really weird stories that discredit the entire thing. There's a lot of really weird pieces of evidence surrounding the entire thing