1ºATTENTION!! Please.
CNN reported that the suspect (Bryan Kohberger) was stopped twice in December by Indiana State Police.
How in gods name could they miss right there, highlighted in the sunlight, what looks to be some sort of gash on the outside of his right hand/arm just above the wrist like maybe a knife slash or someone fighting back?
Plus, his hands looked very very red like he’d been scrubbing them hard..
If you agree, please help me find someone to relay this to. I’m not saying he’s guilty but he sure should be asked to explain that injury which looks like it was semi-healed, probably from November when the killings occurred..
(I have the pic which has been shown widely on CNN and other TV outlets. I’m not allowed to post it here.)
2ºAnne Murray The point I was making is how the media cover stories differently, and a lot of it has to do with the race of the person or the gender. Just look at how the media will cover a story about a woman that has a inappropriate relationship with a minor compared to a man having the same inappropriate relationship  with a minor. They will talk about the woman’s abusive relationship with her husband, they will mention looks (how pretty she is) she has mental issues or she has low self-esteem and in most cases the woman will get less time but when it’s a man involved, it is a totally reported by the media different.  I just think the media should cover the story fairly and honestly. Evil is evil and a criminal is a criminal 
3ºJimmy Messina there was mountains of evidence against him though. It’s not apples to apples. Look, I’m not for advocating his innocence. You may have me confused. I’m simply stating it’s a possibility this guy could walk. It’s possible that other dna evidence could be placed at the scene as well. For example, if a crime is commited at a gas station that you frequent on a regular basis, it’s possible that YOUR dna could be placed at the scene along with your vehicle.
I’m just saying, that’s not evidence to speculate beyond the doubt of reason. A good defending attorney can poke holes and get the jury questioning (aka, doubting) the prosecution’s case.
The defendant doesn’t need to prove his innocence. The prosecutor needs to prove his guilt
4ºIf I was accused of a quadruple homicide that I didn’t do, I would not be calm as this man is. I would be sobbing, I would be hysterical, and I would be flabbergasted by the fact that I had been arrested for such a heinous act. His reaction to being arrested, and the fact that he is so calm about it is telling in and of itself. This guy is a narcissist, and he probably thinks he’s going to get away with it because of his criminal justice background. He thinks he’s always the smartest guy in the room. That said, I bet he wasn’t counting on genetic genealogy factoring in. You would think he would be familiar with the latest techniques in law enforcement, but I’m betting that he didn’t think genetic genealogy would be used on such a new case. If you’re not familiar with genetic genealogy’s role in solving cases, familiarize yourself with it because many cases are going to get solved where the perpetrators have already counted on haven’t gotten away with their crime. It’s a definite game changer.