1ºHere is something to consider, and why the National Security Act is necessary. A ambush and unprecedented losses based upon the security apparatuses and the State Department acting in loyalty for foreign states. In 1940 what you are doing, death penalty crimes. Even in 1981, with a Democrat controlled Congress this would be deemed criminal. A war with China and Russia where we lose within the opening moments a few Carrier Groups, and a few thousand Troops. The leaks, and compromised intelligence and even a bunch of you journalists to include the principal owners need to face these treason trials and immediate executions. It explains why that dumpster fire Trump along with you idiots are the true threats. When we hear the word democracy, it wasn’t mentioned or defined as this until the present. For every 1 Russian there are 20 Europeans, a war with Russia there will be 10 American Troops for 1 European NATO Country.
2ºI'M WRITTING THIS MESSAGE IN CAPITOL LETTERS SO THAT CNN CAN CLEARLY READ IT
THE LEAKED DOCS TELL A DIFFERENT STORY IT SHOWS THAT UKRAINE IS ACTUALLY THE ONE STRUGGLING
ONE YEAR INTO THIS WAR AND USA SENT MORE THAN 100 BILLION WORTH OF MILITARY AID TO UKRAINE THAT'S MORE THAN THE RUSSIAN ANNUAL MILITARY BUDGET AND YET BILLIONS OF TAXS PAYER MONEY SPENT IN UKRAINE AND YET NO SIGNIFICANT GAINS FOR UKRAINE AND STILL LOSING GROUND IN BAKHMUT TO THE RUSSIAN OR IS IT ZELENSKY POCKETED THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT'S AN EASY WAY TO BECOME RICH FAST AND BLAME IT ON THE RUSSIANS!
3ºIt’s necessary to send a signal for all times: modern democracy is nowhere burdened by indecision and red tape, and everywhere is more effective than dictatorship. To do this, Bakhmut needs long-rage weapons, including ATACMS missiles & western fighter jets, including F-16s. They should have been there a long time ago, since the military, ideological and psychological significance of Bakhmut is great. Especially after the Allies stared at the events in Mariupol. I don’t know whether the priorities of the next “Ramstein”, announced by the Ukrainian authorities, are understood in such a way that the issue of ATACMS and other long-rage weapons is covered by them. If not, Ukrainians persist on including the issue in the agenda. In any case, we are convinced that our partners have enough weapons so that Ukraine isn’t forced to look for priorities regarding types of assistance. That is, without restrictions. This option is the most beneficial for everyone, if, in President Biden’s opinion, there is an invisible and unknown to science armored halo around Putin.
The intelligence services of former US Presidents missed appearance of Putin as aggressor. Former US Presidents missed appearance of Putin as aggressor. Or gave birth, having come up with the Budapest Memorandum? Indeed, they gave birth. I support: they made a mistake “in every point and on all fronts”. Now it’s necessary to clean up the consequences of errors. President Xi’s powerphilia was missed too. Weak watchdog. Meanwhile, the President is watching the Aleppo scenario in Bakhmut as if he‘s unaware of the existence of the International Court. Obviously, Taiwan doesn’t pose a military threat to China, even if “paranoid” Putin whispers to President Xi the contrary. China and Taiwan are just competitors in different areas. And it’s legal. Are there territorial issues? So let President Xi not be annoyed by the fact of the existence of Taiwan, but turn to the Court for civilized answers. Nobody wants the worsening of the situation in Taiwan. Don’t take a seat in the same cinema as President Xi and Putin. Someone could have been wrong before. It’s not allowed now. Neither for Ukraine with the Allies, nor for China. Times are changed. Civilization is different. And the armament is different. President Joe Biden has yet no to supply Ukraine with ATACMS missiles (not just 150-km smart bombs) and F-16s. Apparently, the President is embarrassed by Putin. President Biden has repeatedly overcame Putin’s “red lines” in one way or another. And there was no harm for the US and Mr. Biden. And won’t be. Need to remove a number of technologies from the F-16? Ok. The details of using weapons under coordination can always be discussed. “Moving” agreement is not so difficult to find. Don’t be afraid, Putin won’t cut off anything of the dwellers of your countries. But for this, Ukraine needs long-rage weapons, including ATACMS missiles & western fighter jets, including F-16s. In the medium term, the F-16 & so on will become obsolete. Nothing to be sorry about. Thank you. G7
Olaf Scholz
Annalena Baerbock
Boris Pistorius
Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann
Rishi Sunak
Ben Wallace
James Cleverly
UK House of Commons
UK House of Lords
UK Prime Minister
UK government
Ministry of Defence
British Army
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
HM Armed Forces
Omid Nouripour
Johann David Wadephul
Jürgen Hardt
Roderich Kiesewetter
Boris Johnson
CNN
USA TODAY
ABC News
TIME
The New York Times
Washington Post
Voice of America
The Wall Street Journal
POLITICO
Bloomberg
Foreign Policy
Defense News
Офіс Президента України
Міністерство закордонних справ України / MFA of Ukraine
Резніков Олексій
Міністерство оборони України
4ºIt’s necessary to send a signal for all times: modern democracy is nowhere burdened by indecision and red tape, and everywhere is more effective than dictatorship. To do this, Bakhmut needs long-rage weapons, including ATACMS missiles & western fighter jets, including F-16s. They should have been there a long time ago, since the military, ideological and psychological significance of Bakhmut is great. Especially after the Allies stared at the events in Mariupol. I don’t know whether the priorities of the next “Ramstein”, announced by the Ukrainian authorities, are understood in such a way that the issue of ATACMS and other long-rage weapons is covered by them. If not, Ukrainians persist on including the issue in the agenda. In any case, we are convinced that our partners have enough weapons so that Ukraine isn’t forced to look for priorities regarding types of assistance. That is, without restrictions. This option is the most beneficial for everyone, if, in President Biden’s opinion, there is an invisible and unknown to science armored halo around Putin.
The intelligence services of former US Presidents missed appearance of Putin as aggressor. Former US Presidents missed appearance of Putin as aggressor. Or gave birth, having come up with the Budapest Memorandum? Indeed, they gave birth. I support: they made a mistake “in every point and on all fronts”. Now it’s necessary to clean up the consequences of errors. President Xi’s powerphilia was missed too. Weak watchdog. Meanwhile, the President is watching the Aleppo scenario in Bakhmut as if he‘s unaware of the existence of the International Court. Obviously, Taiwan doesn’t pose a military threat to China, even if “paranoid” Putin whispers to President Xi the contrary. China and Taiwan are just competitors in different areas. And it’s legal. Are there territorial issues? So let President Xi not be annoyed by the fact of the existence of Taiwan, but turn to the Court for civilized answers. Nobody wants the worsening of the situation in Taiwan. Don’t take a seat in the same cinema as President Xi and Putin. Someone could have been wrong before. It’s not allowed now. Neither for Ukraine with the Allies, nor for China. Times are changed. Civilization is different. And the armament is different. President Joe Biden has yet no to supply Ukraine with ATACMS missiles (not just 150-km smart bombs) and F-16s. Apparently, the President is embarrassed by Putin. President Biden has repeatedly overcame Putin’s “red lines” in one way or another. And there was no harm for the US and Mr. Biden. And won’t be. Need to remove a number of technologies from the F-16? Ok. The details of using weapons under coordination can always be discussed. “Moving” agreement is not so difficult to find. Don’t be afraid, Putin won’t cut off anything of the dwellers of your countries. But for this, Ukraine needs long-rage weapons, including ATACMS missiles & western fighter jets, including F-16s. In the medium term, the F-16 & so on will become obsolete. Nothing to be sorry about. Thank you.
European Commission
Council of the European Union
European Parliament
President of the European Parliament
Roberta Metsola Charles MICHEL
CSIS | Center for Strategic & International Studies
Institute for the Study of War
The International Institute for Strategic Studies
RUSI - Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies
Bild DW Deutsch
DER SPIEGEL WELT
Le Figaro Le Parisien
Le Monde
BBC News
Daily Mail
Sky News
The Guardian
Reuters UK
Financial Times
The Economist
The Times and The Sunday Times
Офіс Президента України
Міністерство закордонних справ України / MFA of Ukraine
Резніков Олексій
Міністерство оборони України
5ºDesde el inicio de la ofensiva están diciendo que Rusia se quedó sin misiles, sin tanques , sin municiones , sin aviones , sin helicópteros y entonces por que la OTAN no ha ganado la guerra , por que no avanzan hacia Moscú , no se han dado cuenta que la economía rusa pasó a economía de guerra y que las fábricas de armamento están trabajando 24/7 en cambio los Estados Unidos con sus vasallos de la OTAN no sólo han llevado a desangrar al ejército títere ucraniano sino que lo han expuesto a que Rusia le destruya todo su arsenal que lo ubicaba después de Rusia en el ejército mejor armado de europa , hoy la OTAN está rearmando al despedazado ejército ucranazi bajo la consigna “ hasta el último ucraniano” pero eso ha conllevado que sus reservas armamentística se les halla reducido , Rusia derrota al ejército ucraniano haciendo uso como fuerzas de choques a los Wagner en tanto su reserva o ejército profesional espera en la retaguardia , la otan está desesperada !!