1ºSharon Mixon Kelly We are not all that naive. These same governors--who you falsely claim are doing this to protect "women"--have marginalized women in any manner possible, namely even overturning a woman's right to safe abortion to a point where they will see a woman die with a fatal pregnancy related complication, which are common. A woman or child cannot even get away from their criminal attacker by having an abortion now. So don't spew self righteousness to me and say how christian you are. I am done with that hypocrisy. And I call it out. If you all are so concerned about your sports, over the lives of women and over the well-being of those who are LBGTQ, your priorities are insanely skewed. You know, if you wanted to try to problem solve for a positive result for everyone, you would be doing it. Instead I see nothing but harm.
2ºTommy Lewis To implement gun control they would most likely need an amendment to the constitution so that regulations can be put on the right to bear arms, that requires more than just “control” of any branch or all branches of the government. They would need 2/3rds vote in the House, which would be 288 representatives, or 2/3rds of the states (33) just to propose the change and then they need 3/4ths of the Senate to ratify it- which would be 75 votes. Tell me- when did democrats have that kind of power without Republican aid, and when would republicans have been willing to do it?
3ºFirstly, Ernie, the USA was STILL in Trump's final fiscal year until October 1st, 2021. Inflation was 5.4%. By the summer of 2019 BEFORE COVID ever hit the USA Trump's economic and tariff polices had both the US manufacturing and trucking sectors in recession. https://www.marketwatch.c...rter-2019-07-16
https://www.barrons.com/a...low-51565880739
Secondly, Trump's spending before COVID led to the 5.4% inflation that we saw during his last fiscal year. https://www.propublica.org/article/national-debt-trump
Inflation is currently 4.9%, which is lower than where Trump left it.
Thirdly, your remark that "an op piece by an anti-monopoly progressive in favor of Government control over corporations" is nothing but weak Genetic Fallacy to avoid addressing the contents.
Lastly, cry harder.
4ºTrans rights violate womens rights. No biological female should have to share a locker room or showers with a trans person. They don't want to see you junk. Also in women's sports the ladies are rated on their abilities in order to get sports scholarships. A trans athelete displaces these women when they win competions due to being phyically strronger do to being born male. I have zero problem with the trans community. But you can't displace the rights of women for a .01 % of the population. Bud light chose to avertise to .07% of the trans population over their core drinkers and you see how that turned out.
5ºPamela Stansberry What this is doing is to stop any oppression of women. Women fought long and hard to have their own sports teams and it needs to stay as women’s sports team. They are not oppressing the LGBTQ they are simply protecting the rights of women to compete. It has nothing to do with claiming g to be morally superior.
And by al means, pick out a perfect Christian that has not sinned. You can’t. They don’t exist. No Christian ever claimed to be perfect or without sin. If they did, they are lying.
As for the sake of greed? That’s on both sides of the aisle and to say different is being very naive.
6ºBella Ruiz All of the things you have mentioned have been a part of one or more proposed bills that have been introduced by democrats and then blocked or defeated by the right’s refusal at a bipartisan solution. Just by looking at this thread it is highly doubtful that those blocking the bills will be voted out of congress. Even if constituents in red states want gun control they vote for people who will not push for it. A constitutional amendment is even less likely, but it would give bills a better chance at not being challenged by a state or citizen as unconstitutional, and keep it from being sent to a judicial review that could decide it is indeed an unconstitutional measure.
7ºLove should never hurt cause we all get into it with happiness and pure mind, my relationship happened to take a sad turn as my Fiancé resulted to domestic violence and womanizing when he’d lost his job due to covid and this broke me down so I decided to look for a way to restore my once happy relationship back and I came across Priestess Saintjourney on Facebook who’d help me to work on my man and now he’s all good and doing well now, I’d recommend her for anyone going through Relationship, Marriage, Financial difficulty, Court case, Spiritual problems etc. She’s really reliable, you can get in touch with her via her Facebook page
Priestess Saintjourney
8ºTia Lugo "As a man", sweetheart? What if I decided to "identify" as a transgender? Would my opinion be considered any differently in your insanely, bizarre and fictitious imaginary world?
Don't want to get pregnant? Then keep your knees together instead of allowing your raging hormones to get the better of you to the point that you're sharing the sheets recklessly and irresponsibly.
Instead of being reactive to a life-changing situation that can be destructive to an innocent human life... you could be PRO-active and prevent the situation from ever becoming a problem.
But that takes a little personal responsibility -- which undoubtedly you perhaps have never considered.
You're welcome.
9ºSean Seifert Lame response. Do you know 20 or 30 years ago I was considered a moderate. A moderate democrat. My views have not changed. And now the simple minded call me "far left." But "far right" is actually white supremacy these days. They proudly declare that themselves. And trump endorses them. "Poor proud boys. Poor Oath Keepers. So unfair the were sentenced to prison because I asked them to violently attack our Nation's Capitol." Trump says it clearly all the time. Do you know what liberal means? It is to liberate. To be free. Do you know what conservative is? To conserve something. So what are you conserving? It ain't morals or goodness or human rights or workers rights or civil rights or economic stability or the environment or education. Do you think conserving the good old uber wealthy white "landowners" boys that originally brought America the KKK and poverty through devision and oppression is "conserving?" Pretty sure that is not the original intention.
10ºScott Anderson - Nearly every Congress member, President + Alejandro Mayorkas, secretary Homeland security’s and experts has stated the Immigration System is decades old, broken and an bipartisan Comprehensive Immigration Reform needs to happen.
IF all that was needed was using “strictly enforced” tactics, then why was there a massive migration influx while Trump was President?
Why did Trump need to use bullying tactics like Cartel thugs to try and control the massive amounts of people seeking asylum at the border.
Why did Trump need to use Title 42 as a tool to try and stop the legal process of asylum seekers? Stay in your lane!