1ºMarty Katz I am currently supporting Vivek as my choice in 2024. I don't like the weaponization of the Justice system. The past three years has made me lose faith in our federal government. Trying not being a tribalist and look how corrupt this government is. You watch CNN and they cover the persecution of the orange fella 24-7 yet won't cover the Biden crime family. Good news is that the Mainstream media is a dying platform and this is going to be the last election they will have any influence. That is a good thing for democracy in the end.
2ºAll I can say is Trump doesn't care about anything anymore. Trump has shown contempt for the law, the court, the justice department and the rule of law. Trump could care less about being told by the judge not to do anything. Trump will break every rule, defy every court order because he doesn't CARE. Trump is daring the judge to arrest him, and he is going to continue to do and say what he wants no matter. Trump doesn't respect the law, he feels he is bigger that the law, bigger than the courts. How do you control a person such as that? You put him in jail
3ºCNN is filled with people suffering from terminal TDS. Their total lack of self awareness is almost comical, but in reality is dangerous. So yesterday, they accurately wrote " “The Sixth Circuit sent a pretty strong message today that no matter who you are, what you look like, or what you’re accused of, you are entitled to be treated with dignity, respect, and, above all, actual fairness,” Liggins’ attorney, Wade Fink, told CNN.
“When judges, prosecutors, defense lawyers, police, or others fail to uphold their oaths in protecting the presumptively innocent, then community faith in our system is lost and our republic struggles to function,” Fink said." when they are talking about a black man and a biased judge but Trump is not afforded the same treatment. They scream about Judge Cannon, but ignore that major conflict of interest with the judge in DC. An Obama appointee who worked in the same law firm with Hunter, when the firm was representing Burisma, but no conflict. Nothing to see here SMH
4ºRaymond Phillips it's not koolaid to quote O'Reilly, it's all FACT. U JUST CANT Believe HOW BUFFALOED U R. IF I TOLD U EVERYDAY FOR 6 MONTHS UE MOM WAS 2 BIT HO, YOUD BEGIN TO BELIEVE. NOW TRY THAT EVERYDAY FOR 7 YEARS. TRUMP HAS RIGHT TO DECLASSIFY,BIDEN DID NOT AS VP. BHE CAN QUESTION ELECTION AND DID NOTHING BUT OFFER 1O,OOO NATL GUARD. SO WHAT DID HE DO? THESE DEM CROOKS KNOW HE LL SAVE AMERICA AND MAKE HER THRIVE AGAIN. THEY WANT TO DESTROY HER. LOOK AT ALL DEM RUN CITIES. SOME DEMS WOULD KILL NEWBORN. THEY LET QUEERS RUIN BOT SCOUTS,GIRLS SPORTS, HIJACK CHRISTIAN
RAINBOW. THEY LIE DAILY. U BRAINWASH EASY BUT UR NOT PART OF ELITES FOOLING YOU. THEY USE UR DUMASS FOR VOTES. WHEN THEY FINALIZE AMERICAS FALL,UR A DEPLORABLE JUST LIKE ME,WITH NO FREEDOM,FUTURE,LIFE. AND U HELPED THESE FREAKS.
5ºThe left winged prosecutor opened up Pandoras box when they involved the election. Now TRUMP has the right to present what ever he needs. Especially to prove election fraud. Despite what prosecutor request, otherwise throw the case out. Legally the left can't have it both ways. The Two tier justice system is just not acceptable. Misleading Conspiracy Theories & Hearsay hold no weight in a court of law. There will be no legitimate reason to even pursue the case simply based on that. The case will no doubt be dismissed within the first 10 minutes based on the insufficient evidence from Jack Smith & his communist cult. ️ So go laugh that off Tards.
6ºSpecial Counsel Smith filed a motion for a protective order based on Trump’s threatening social media posts. In under 24 hours, Trump violated the terms of his release, following his arraignment in DC as he threatened prosecutors, witnesses, future jurors & anyone who dare to go against him. Under oath, Trump swore that he wouldn’t attempt to influence or intimidate witnesses, retaliate against anyone, or in any other way attempt to obstruct the administration of justice. Judge: “Are you prepared to comply?" Trump: “Yes.” The judge told Trump that should he violate the conditions of his release, she’d consider sending him to jail pending trial. "You’ve heard your conditions of release. It’s important you comply. You may be held pending trial in this case if you violate the conditions of release."
Trump’s campaign defended Trump’s threats, ‘I’m coming after you,’ in wake of a proposed protective order. “The Truth post cited is the definition of political speech & was in response to the RINO, China-loving, dishonest special interest groups & Super PACs, like the ones funded by the Koch brothers & the Club for No Growth.”
7ºMister Donald President ain’t dangerous! Scientists even had to take the nickname gentle giant from a grey whale and give it to him. That’s how gentle and peaceful he is. He’s a gentle giant that just wants to spread his message of love, peace, hope, equality, understanding, tolerance and kindness throughout the galaxy. He’s basically a Care Bear. Any judge that grants protection to Jack Sparrow is going to be part of a LIB COMMIE conspiracy to TARNISH Mister Donald President’s upstanding character of love. The libs gotta stop painting Mister Donald President out to be some immoral lunatic with no conscience! It ain’t right! It’s character assassination I say!
8ºArron Plants she knows her job.
On November 9, 2021, Chutkan denied former President Donald Trump's plea to keep records from being released to the House Select Committee investigating the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021.[37][38] The D.C. Circuit affirmed that decision, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined review.[39]
Chutkan has overseen the trials of more than 30 defendants in cases related to the January 6 Capitol attack. According to The Washington Post, she has been the toughest sentencing judge in those cases, ordering at least some jail or prison time in all cases, and sometimes exceeding the sentence recommended by prosecutors.[40]
9ºWell, I think it's certainly a complex and multi-layered case. On the one hand, I can see why prosecutors would want to use Trump's own words against him, as they're clearly relevant to the case. On the other hand, I think it raises some questions about the nature of social media and how it can be used in legal proceedings. For example, is it possible for a defendant's social media posts to be taken out of context or misinterpreted? And what about the question of privacy? After all, social media posts are often intended for a specific audience, not for public consumption.
10ºJudith Diane he can say what he wants as long as he doesn’t threaten and endanger witnesses or try to coerce witnesses or intimidate jurists. Remember, his words inspired riots and threats to government officials, as is well documented.
If there is a valid defense against Trump, he can try it in court..so far he and his acolytes haven’t trotted one out. If there is valid evidence against Joe Biden, then a proper investigation can proceed and if appropriate action taken…but so far there is none of that either. See the problem here? No proof against Biden, plenty of proof and no good defense for Trump.