NASA’s ‘shout’ restores communication with Voyager 2

Using a long-shot “shout” maneuver, the Voyager mission team at NASA has reestablished communication with Voyager 2 after losing contact with the spacecraft, which has been operating for nearly 46 years.

           

https://www.facebook.com/cnn/posts/677608447565143

OH, OK, WELL, MAYBE I WILL BLOCK YOUR COMMUNICATION CHANNEL, I AM FROM THE ORION SYSTEM, I CONTROL, NASA... VOYAGER... I CAN BLOCK ALL EARTH'S COMMUNICATION, TAKE DOWN ALL THE SATELLITES, SERIOUS SITUATION NOW... NO MORE INTERNET, NOTHING, I CAN DO IT, I AM FROM THE ORION SYSTEM... NOT EVEN A JOKE HERE, I AM AN ALIEN... MISS IRIS DE GRAAF FROM THE NETHERLANDS, A JOURNALIST FOR THE NOS, CANNOT GO BACK TO RUSSIA, CAUSE, SHE WILL BE ARRESTED, I AM ONLY TRYING TO PROTECT HER, SHE CANNOT GO BACK TO RUSSIA, CAUSE, OF HER REPORTING, NOT ALLOWED IN RUSSIA, SO, DO NOT, SEND HER BACK... IT WILL BE, A PROBLEM...


(B.A. Bible/Biology)*

JUST BECAUSE SCIENCE CAN EXPLAIN how an airplane works doesn't mean that no one designed or made the airplane. And just because science can explain how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Designer and Maker behind them.

Natural laws may explain how the order in the universe works and operates, but mere undirected natural laws cannot explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell then the genetic code and biological machinery exist to direct the formation of more cells from raw materials such as amino acids and other chemicals, but how could life or the cell have naturally originated when no directing code and mechanisms existed in nature? Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.

WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No human observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports.

SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE CANNOT BE ETERNAL because it could not have sustained itself eternally due to the law of entropy (increasing and irreversible net energy decay, even in an open system). Even a hypothetical oscillating universe (i.e. multiple "big bangs") could not continue to oscillate eternally! Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity shows that space, matter, and time all are physical and all had a beginning. Space even produces particles because it’s actually something, not nothing. What about the Higgs boson (the so-called “God Particle”)? The Higgs boson, even if it existed, would not have created mass from nothing, but rather it would have converted energy into mass. Einstein showed that all matter is some form of energy. Even time had a beginning! Time is not eternal.

The law of entropy doesn't allow the universe to be eternal. If the universe were eternal, everything, including time (which modern science has shown is as physical as mass and space), would have become totally entropied by now and the entire universe would have ended in a uniform heat death a long, long time ago. The fact that this hasn't happened already is powerful evidence for a beginning to the universe.

Popular atheistic scientist Stephen Hawking admits that the universe had a beginning and came from nothing but he believes that nothing became something by a natural process yet to be discovered. That's not rational thinking at all, and it also would be making the effect greater than its cause to say that nothing created something. The beginning had to be of supernatural origin because science teaches us from the First Law of Thermodynamics that natural laws and processes do not have the ability to bring something into existence from nothing.

The supernatural origin of the universe cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence and power for the origin and order of the universe. Where did God come from? Obviously, unlike the universe, God’s nature doesn’t require a beginning.

The disorder in the universe can be explained because of chance and random processes, but the order can be explained only because of intelligence and design.

Gravity may explain how the order found in the precise and orderly courses of thousands of billions of stars is maintained, but gravity cannot explain the origin of that order.

Some evolutionary astronomers believe that trillions of stars crashed into each other leaving surviving stars to find precise orderly orbits in space. Not only is this irrational, but if there was such a mass collision of stars then there would be a super mass residue of gas clouds in space to support this hypothesis. The present level of residue of gas clouds in space doesn't support the magnitude of star deaths required for such a hypothesis. And, as already stated, the origin of stars cannot be explained by the Big Bang because of the reasons mentioned above. It’s one thing to say that stars may decay and die into random gas clouds, but it is totally different to say that gas clouds form into stars.

Even the father of Chaos theory admitted that the "mechanisms" existing in the non-living world allow for only very rudimentary levels of order to arise spontaneously (by chance), but not the kind or level of order we find in the structures of DNA, RNA, and proteins. Yes, individual amino acids have been shown to come into existence by chance but not protein molecules which require that the various amino acids be in a precise sequence just like the letters found in a sentence.

Some things don’t need experiment or scientific proof. In law there is a dictum called prima facie evidence. It means “evidence that speaks for itself.”

An example of a true prima facie would be if you discovered an elaborate sand castle on the beach. You don’t have to experiment to know that it came by design and not by the chance forces of wind and water.

If you discovered a romantic letter or message written in the sand, you don’t have to experiment to know that it was by design and not because a stick randomly carried by wind put it there. You naturally assume that an intelligent and rational being was responsible.

It's interesting that Carl Sagan would have acknowledged sequential radio signals in space as evidence of intelligent life sending them, but he wouldn't acknowledge the sequential structure of molecules in DNA (the genetic code) as evidence of an intelligent Cause. Read my popular Internet article, HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME.

Where did God come from? Unlike the universe, God’s nature doesn’t require a beginning. We know from science that the universe requires a beginning because the universe could not have sustained itself eternally.

I encourage all to read my popular Internet articles (Just google these titles followed by my name):

THE NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION (Medium dot com)

HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

Visit my latest Internet site: THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (This site answers many arguments, both old and new, that have been used by evolutionists to support their theory)

Author of popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS

*I have given successful lectures (with question and answer period afterwards) defending creation before evolutionist science faculty and students at various colleges and universities. I've been privileged to be recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis "Who's Who in The East" for my writings on religion and science.


Final Call by:
Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammad Al-Yemeni
The levels of climate temperature continue rising because of hell’s flame in addition to the sun’s heat in the decisive grand Quran..
08 - Muharram - 1445 AH
July - 26 - 2023 AD
07:46 am
(According to the official time of [Mecca] mother of towns)
_____________
https:/*/mahdialumma.org/showthread.php?p=422804
"So often the sun overtook the moon, so it was born before the solar eclipse and the sun met with it while it just a newly crescent, and the sign of overtaking was coming into view of the humans, and in spite of their noses was saying (it is) the night of the middle on the thirteenth day of the lunar month, while they know that the full moon occurs on the fourteenth day on the night of the fifteenth! But an entire world’s generation of youths were brought up and their eyes were opened on the fact that the moon appears on the thirteenth and not on the fourteenth, so I prayed to Allah to uphold the argument as well against the youth of the world by returning the moon to its normal position as it was since Allah created the heavens and the earth, so that the youth of the whole world may know that the moon rises as full moon after sunset on the fourteenth day (which is) the night of the fifteenth since Allah created the heavens and the earth; that it should not be for the sun to overtake the moon, so the crescent would be born before the pairing, and the sun would meet with it while it is a newly crescent, as happened in the sign of the greater overtaking in Dhul Hijjah for the year (1442 AH), so the impossible full moon occurred on the evening of Friday the night of Saturday, verily if you only know the greatness of the impossible that the full moon rises as like the night in which (Al-Muhaq) the dark moon occurred, So those are the full-moons of the cosmic miracles which are not hidden from any sane human being because of the birth of the crescent just before the solar eclipse and met the sun with it while it is a newly crescent. So the full-moons miracles were occurring in the same way as the night in which (Al-Muhaq) the dark moon occurs, which is on the same night in which the central pairing occurs. So can that be, night of the middle on the thirteenth day in many years of the mahdiship call, so the night of the middle of the month was causing the giant full-moons on the night of the thirteenth before its appointed time which been established on the evening of the fourteenth day (night of the fifteenth)?! But unfortunately, the astronomers were hindering (others) against the sign of overtaking, so they introduced a new term and called it moon of the rock-bottom, while they knew with certainty that they were watching with CCD cameras the crescent of the month being born before the solar eclipse, so the sun would meet with it while it’s just a newly crescent, so they would hid it from the worlds for fear of acknowledging the sign of overtaking for the Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammad Al-Yemeni. Verily, the moon was forcing them to announce the full moon on the evening of the thirteenth day of the month and not the evening of the fourteenth day (the night of the fifteenth) the expected night of the middle in each month as usual.

In any case, the hindering continued until Allah exposed them and scattered them from their behind in Ramadan (1443 AH), then Allah restored the moon to the place which was before the overtaking. Then the moon forced the entire astronomers to admit that the moon rose as full-moon on the evening of Saturday (night of Sunday), in a sense, on the fifteenth day (night of the sixteenth) of Ramadan although the mad the people fast on Saturday, and after Ramadan (1443 AH) the moon of the thirteenth disappeared, and till now it is still in its natural position as it was from before the occurrence of sign of the overtaking for the warner moon throughout the passed years of the global mahdiship call. But the question that comes up for all humans: Where did the moon of the thirteenth of the lunar month go?! We no longer hear about it at all although they were not entering the month legitimately according to the sighting of the crescent by the naked eye, and after the moon returned to its natural position since Ramadan for the year 1443, and as that Ramadan for the year 1444 Hijri."


U përpoqa më shumë për ta bërë marrëdhënien tonë të funksionojë
jashtë, por burri im dukej se nuk i interesonte. dhe ai u nda me mua. Isha konfuz dhe nuk dija çfarë të bëja përsëri, përkundrazi rashë në kontakt me Dr Michael Ai bëri një bukuri dashurie që bëri që burri im të kthehej tek unë, Tani jemi shumë të lumtur me veten. Dr Michael e bën atë të kuptojë se sa shumë e duam dhe kemi nevojë për njëri-tjetrin, ky njeri është për të vërtetë dhe për të mirë. Ai gjithashtu mund t'ju ndihmojë të rregulloni marrëdhënien tuaj të prishur.
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100095292423119


Final Call by:
Imam Mahdi Nasser Mohammad Al-Yemeni
The levels of climate temperature continue rising because of hell’s flame in addition to the sun’s heat in the decisive grand Quran..
08 - Muharram - 1445 AH
July - 26 - 2023 AD
07:46 am
(According to the official time of [Mecca] mother of towns)
_____________
https://mahdialumma.net/showthread.php?p=422804
" So we will direct questions to Allah Lord of the worlds, and we leave the answers from Allah with His words directly from His decisive Book; the grand Quran, and I say:

Q 1: Oh Allah, is there in Your Book a month of nineteen days from the date of sighting the crescent of the month, or do the humans not see the crescent except after thirty nights from sighting the crescent of the passed month, then the sighting of crescent of the new month would be established for the whole world on the evening of the thirteenth day (first night from the new month), so the sighting of crescent of the new month is proven for the whole world for each one according to the horizon of his sunset (his westerly horizon) after ending the number of days of the previous month (thirty nights) then the crescent of the new month appears after completion the count number of the past month (thirty days) so the sighting with the naked eye would be proven for each who has eyes sees with it? Oh our Allah, teach the people with the answer from Your decisive Book, glory be to You, we have no knowledge except what You taught us, surely You are the All Knowing, the Wise.
To the answer from Allah directly, A 1: Allah the Most High said: [Al-Baqarah] 2:185-186
{شَهْرُ رَمَضَانَ الَّذِي أُنزِلَ فِيهِ الْقُرْآنُ هُدًى لِّلنَّاسِ وَبَيِّنَاتٍ مِّنَ الْهُدَىٰ وَالْفُرْقَانِ ۚ فَمَن شَهِدَ مِنكُمُ الشَّهْرَ فَلْيَصُمْهُ ۖ وَمَن كَانَ مَرِيضًا أَوْ عَلَىٰ سَفَرٍ فَعِدَّةٌ مِّنْ أَيَّامٍ أُخَرَ ۗ يُرِيدُ اللَّهُ بِكُمُ الْيُسْرَ وَلَا يُرِيدُ بِكُمُ الْعُسْرَ وَلِتُكْمِلُوا الْعِدَّةَ وَلِتُكَبِّرُوا اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ مَا هَدَاكُمْ وَلَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ ‎﴿١٨٥﴾‏ وَإِذَا سَأَلَكَ عِبَادِي عَنِّي فَإِنِّي قَرِيبٌ ۖ أُجِيبُ دَعْوَةَ الدَّاعِ إِذَا دَعَانِ ۖ فَلْيَسْتَجِيبُوا لِي وَلْيُؤْمِنُوا بِي لَعَلَّهُمْ يَرْشُدُونَ ‎﴿١٨٦﴾‏} [البقرة] صدق الله العظيم.
Q 2: Therefore, — Oh my God, it is according to Your fatwa there is no month of twenty-nine days confirming with Your true fatwa about completing the number thirty days of the month by sighting the crescent of Shawwal with the evidence of the word of Allah Most High: [Al-Baqarah] 2:185
{وَلِتُكْمِلُوا الْعِدَّةَ وَلِتُكَبِّرُوا اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ مَا هَدَاكُمْ وَلَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ ‎﴿١٨٥﴾‏} صدق الله العظيم
So this means that the crescent sighting is by the naked eye after completing the count of thirty days; so does this mean that the count-number of the months is thirty days for each month to be calculated from the crescent sighting to the crescent sighting of the new month, and between them is thirty days? So add to us the numerical count for days of each month that its count number is thirty days, glory be to You, we have no knowledge except what You taught us, surely You are the All Knowing, the Wise.

And the Answer, A 2: Allah the Most High said: [Al-Mujadalah] 58:3-5
{وَالَّذِينَ يُظَاهِرُونَ مِن نِّسَائِهِمْ ثُمَّ يَعُودُونَ لِمَا قَالُوا فَتَحْرِيرُ رَقَبَةٍ مِّن قَبْلِ أَن يَتَمَاسَّا ۚ ذَٰلِكُمْ تُوعَظُونَ بِهِ ۚ وَاللَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيرٌ ‎﴿٣﴾‏ فَمَن لَّمْ يَجِدْ فَصِيَامُ شَهْرَيْنِ مُتَتَابِعَيْنِ مِن قَبْلِ أَن يَتَمَاسَّا ۖ فَمَن لَّمْ يَسْتَطِعْ فَإِطْعَامُ سِتِّينَ مِسْكِينًا ۚ ذَٰلِكَ لِتُؤْمِنُوا بِاللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ ۚ وَتِلْكَ حُدُودُ اللَّهِ ۗ وَلِلْكَافِرِينَ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ ‎﴿٤﴾‏ إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يُحَادُّونَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ كُبِتُوا كَمَا كُبِتَ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِمْ ۚ وَقَدْ أَنزَلْنَا آيَاتٍ بَيِّنَاتٍ ۚ وَلِلْكَافِرِينَ عَذَابٌ مُّهِينٌ ‎﴿٥﴾} [المجادلة] صدق الله العظيم.
Therefore — Oh my God, so this means that the count number for the months is thirty night from the sighting of the crescent on evening of date thirtieth day (first night in the new month) till evening of day thirty (first night in the month which follows it) with the evidence of the word of Allah Most High; [Al-Mujadalah] 58:4
{فَمَن لَّمْ يَجِدْ فَصِيَامُ شَهْرَيْنِ مُتَتَابِعَيْنِ مِن قَبْلِ أَن يَتَمَاسَّا ۖ فَمَن لَّمْ يَسْتَطِعْ فَإِطْعَامُ سِتِّينَ مِسْكِينًا ۚ ذَٰلِكَ لِتُؤْمِنُوا بِاللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ ۚ وَتِلْكَ حُدُودُ اللَّهِ ۗ وَلِلْكَافِرِينَ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ ‎﴿٤﴾‏} صدق الله العظيم
That is, he feeds a poor person every day in exchange for lift off the fast. This means that two consecutive months have exactly sixty days. Each according to his sunset watches for the crescent of the new month on the evening of the thirtieth and not the evening of the twenty-nine with the evidence of the number of days of the two consecutive months (sixty days), so did You command us to look for the crescents with the telescope? Or does the crescent of the new month emerge over all people after completing its true astronomical standards in the Book, then confirming the sighting with the naked eye with ease on the evening of the thirtieth day of the old month, then it is followed by sighting of the crescent of the new month, so all the worlds see it with the naked eye? So this means that You made the crescents of the months accurate times for the people to watch the crescent of the new month every thirty days of the previous month for all people with the naked eye; for those who keep their duty to Allah, and they enter the houses through its doors by sighting the crescent, and not that the crescent is distinguished by sighting it by merely a just witness according to their claim. Confirming with the word of Allah the Most High: [Al-Baqarah] 2:189
{يَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ الْأَهِلَّةِ ۖ قُلْ هِيَ مَوَاقِيتُ لِلنَّاسِ وَالْحَجِّ ۗ وَلَيْسَ الْبِرُّ بِأَن تَأْتُوا الْبُيُوتَ مِن ظُهُورِهَا وَلَٰكِنَّ الْبِرَّ مَنِ اتَّقَىٰ ۗ وَأْتُوا الْبُيُوتَ مِنْ أَبْوَابِهَا ۚ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ ‎﴿١٨٩﴾} [البقرة] صدق الله العظيم."




+