1º"A.I. Transformed Into Illiterate Moron After Just Three Hours Watching CNN"
"Experts believe the A.I., ..... could not escape the black hole of idiocy that is CNN's content.
....A.I. development team first became aware of a problem when the software began speaking illogically about a variety of topics, much like CNN's Jim Acosta.
when it [A.I.] started saying things like 'Biden is a kindly grandpa and is in no way corrupt,' and 'democracy was almost murdered to death on Jan 6,' we knew something was wrong."
....all its [A.I.] errors could be traced back to a three-hour binge of "Who's Talking To Chris Wallace?"
Babylon Bee...
2ºAt a 1981 Memorial Day ceremony, Feinstein presided over the re-installation of the Confederate battle flag in Civic Center as part of a set donated by the Bechtel corporation, at Feinstein’s request, to replace the original flags (Oakland Tribune, April 19, 1984).
“San Francisco is proud to fly these flags where both visitors and residents alike may see and appreciate the more than 200 years of America’s rich history which they symbolize,” she declared, as reported by the May 21, 1981, San Francisco Examiner.
It did not take long before complaints started coming in to the office of Supervisor Doris Ward. Local 6 of the International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union (ILWU) passed a motion demanding that the racist banner come down. It did come down in 1982 for a mass labor rally to get out the vote for the Democrats, but went back up within a week (see “Black Militant Puts Dixie Flag on Trial,” WV No. 357, June 22, 1984).
On April 15, 1984, Black Spartacist League representative Richard (Ritchie) Bradley donned a Civil War Union Army uniform, scaled the 50-foot flagpole and ripped the flag of slavery down. Cheered on by protesters, Pete Woolston, a member of the ILWU Local 6 General Executive Board, burned it. Both Bradley and Woolston were arrested.
Feinstein put the flag right back up. After Bradley ripped the second flag to shreds the next day, he was arrested again After an appeal by Supervisor Ward, Feinstein grudgingly agreed not to put the KKK flag up again. But the city pressed charges against Bradley. As Colin Kalmbacher, writing on the website Law & Crime (Feb. 27, 2018 (https://lawandcrime.com/p...an-francisco/)), put it: “Feinstein’s office worked with San Francisco’s then-District Attorney Arlo Smith on the prosecution. Of particular concern to Feinstein was that Bradley make ‘restitution’ to the City of San Francisco for the destroyed flag.”
Yes, this is a leftist site. But the citations to major newspapers are the citations to major newspapers. They are providing the receipts
3ºJudy Smith That is not a reliable source. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/becker-news/
Their source for the allegations in the first paragraph is, and I'm quoting here, "the House Republican Majority."
The article goes on to state "It did not allow Donald Trump or his legal team to defend themselves." Surprise, targets of congressional investigations are routinely not permitted to do the things Trump wanted to do. That's like arguing a prosecution is invalid because the defense wasn't allowed to participate in the investigation.
Later, the writer states "This committee, as stated by Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA), chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight for the Committee on House Administration to Fox News Digital, has not shown proof of its inquiry into the Capitol Hill security lapses on the riot’s day." That is not a crime, nor is it a black mark for the committee.
At the end, the writer states "Sund posted a scathing resignation letter to former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi over the January 6 security debacle." The writer implies that Sund warned Congress, but Congress dropped the ball somehow. That is not at all what Sund wrote. If you read the resignation letter, he wrote "What occurred on January 6th cannot be considered under any circumstances a protest, a rally, or civil disobedience. This was a well-planned, coordinated, armed insurrection at the United States Capitol."