1ºMarcus Aurelius Aside from you displaying the fragility of your ego that apparently can't handle a commemorative coin being created to honor a black woman who was doing these things 160 years ago, you're also just contradicting the article you used to put on this sad display. The article states..she rescued around 70 people. The "information" you are giving, is a half a@@ed analysis of 1 article, which literally states nothing you have claimed to be fact...not one claim you have made can be verified in the article you are citing. The only conclusion one can draw from any of your statements, is that you are making claims that contradict information you are analyzing..which means you are not a competent researcher, and your purpose here is to trivialize a topic you know virtually nothing about, other than what you read in an article which doesn't support your assertions. So, maybe you should cope with your limitations, and not make it painfully obvious you are no great researcher of anything.
2ºMarcus Aurelius first of all, she didn't name herself "Moses of the South." So your statement "There's no evidence Harriet Tubman was the 'Moses of the South' except for her own accounts" is already misleading. Also, again, the point of the article is clearly not...that it was only her account of her rescues that was all that was ever given to prove that she did rescue slaves. Nowhere in the article states that. That's pretty clear. Even if what you were saying was true, nowhere in the article you are citing, states that. In fact the article says she rescued approximately 70 slaves. You, on your own, have decided that none of this is true, due to what exactly...your misreading of the article.