1ºSteven James Because it’s not about the number of abortions performed it’s about women having the right to choose what’s best for them- what they want for their body, when they want to start a family, who they want to start a family with. This isn’t the “latest cause” women’s rights to their bodies has been an issue for over half a century given that Roe v Wade was decided in 1973. But it has returned because idiotic republicans thought they were going to do something by banning it- well seems they failed, not only did they fail they did the opposite of what they wanted and pushed more people to decide to get abortions.
2ºSpontaneous abortion - (Miscarriage)
For people who refuse to acknowledge the facts many many women miscarry those meds help with that as well some can't take regular birth control so they take the day after pill. This is between mother, doctor, family not politicians! With all due respect these non sense laws on the matter almost killed me four times whilst trying to conceive. A woman shouldn't be forced to carry dead babies...a woman shouldn't be forced to push her uterus out when there's been no heartbeat detected before someone assist. A woman shouldn't have to DIE to prove these lunatics some sort of lesson on how to do their jobs.
3ºChahat Sharma then respect a woman's right to choose! Then feel sorry for woman who are DYING and not being able to get pregnant, from lack of NECESSARY medical treatment! Respect what ANYONE discusses and chooses treatment with a MEDICAL DOCTOR! And lastly, this has NOTHING to do with life. If it did? We would have unlimited affordable medical care AFTER we are born. We would have the #1 educational standards on the planet. We wouldn't have seniors choosing between life saving medications and care, or food and housing. We wouldn't have MILLIONS of VETERANS homeless. I could literally go on and on. Abortion issue has NOTHING to do with valuing life.
4ºPaul Stramer - Lincoln County Watch: International Public Notice:The Situation
Imagine it-- after 164 years people wake up like Rip Van Winkle.
People wake up and realize that the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE is a non-negotiable military scrip used as "legal tender" even though it is not a negotiable instrument because: (1) it does not say when this Promissory Note (IOU) will be repaid and (2) it does not say what it will be repaid with --- what kind of money or asset will be returned to the Receiver of this NOTE.
Then, the idea that it is a military scrip begins to bore into their brains and they all say, WT....! Why would we be using a military scrip as a domestic currency in this country?
That's the sort of thing the military does when they have a base encampment in a foreign country.... like the M.A.S.H. Units in Korea. Everyone remembers Corporal Klinger saving up pink scrip to buy a party dress on base....
Then the bewildered American people find out that they have been living in a country "occupied" by the U.S. Army and that the U.S. Army is a British Territorial Mercenary Force.
And the Civil War wasn't a war. It was a Mercenary Conflict.
The plot thickens.
So, these characters have been operating under False Pretenses for 164 years, claiming to be operating under the Law of War when the Law of War doesn't apply, issuing military scrip and enforcing its use as a domestic currency in The United States?
Nobody could make this up. The American people are shaking their heads and saying, "OMG!"
The U.S. Military has been forcing us to use their military scrip as part of a coercive domestic currency monopoly scheme since 1913, because they, in their Territorial Capacity, set up a Central Bank calling itself the Federal Reserve.
It turns out that the Federal Reserve isn't "Federal"; it's a consortium of private banks that control and issue the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES at the behest of the U.S. Military.
Which is operating as a foreign Territorial (British Crown) Corporation....the USA, Inc., and a foreign Municipal Corporation, the US, INC.
The manure deepens....
We've been captured by our own Army? Really? Held captive and occupied for 164 years by our own Army?
We've allowed our sons and daughters to serve in it and paid for it, and all this while, "our" military has been operating as a foreign British Territorial (British Crown) Corporation Mercenary Force under color of law and pretense of "war" and has been fleecing us blind to benefit foreign interests?
Yes, that's what it amounts to, except that.... what about their "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES"? --- what guarantees them? How can they operate like this?
People now realize that everyone in the military is in a condition of indentured servitude and serving as a "titled person" in the British Service System; they have a contract to serve for a specified time, called a Tour of Duty and titles disguised as ranks....
These people are in peonage and nobody told them that this has been outlawed since 1926. Not one person ever told them that peonage would be the result of their enlistment and that peonage would be imposed for the rest of their lives even after their Tour of Duty ended in their Honorable Discharge.
It's the value of their labor, their energy, their bodies, their performance contracts (not just their Tours, the mortgages, property taxes and all the other taxes and tariffs benefiting the British Crown and Monarch) along with their estimated "value" as bonded Mercenaries that's backing the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.
Peonage has been enforced on them, and their lives, bodies, and living flesh have been illegally, deceitfully, and immorally securitized; they have been denigrated to the political status of a Person, an Indentured Servant, a U.S. Citizen, a British Territorial, a "Hue-man", as if they were all born in Puerto Rico, having nothing but "Human Rights" --- no Constitutional Guarantees, no Natural and Unalienable Rights.
No wonder they are forever "fighting for freedom".
In their current status, they have none.
They are in a condition of abject foreign servitude, akin to the shanghaied members of the French Foreign Legion.
For years, they've been trying to tell us every time they spoke about "their democracy" and "defending democracy" --- well, America isn't a democracy, so what democracy are they defending at our expense--- in blood, in credit, and in assets?
Obviously, they are defending their British Territorial democracy and all that rot about "National Security" was their National Security, not ours, and when they talk about "the Public Good" they