1ºhttp://www.paulstramer.ne...ice-modern.html
International Public Notice: Modern Feudalism and Corporate Press Ganging
People need to understand that no physical change or movement was necessary to create the Legal Presumptions that now rule their lives and denigrate them, first to the foreign status of a mere "Human" and "Person", and second to the foreign status of a THING, a Corporation.
These denigrations happen as the result of either (1) an inherited political status, or (2) an adopted political status, amounting to willing acceptance of such denigration in order to receive the benefits of joining a new body politic via enfranchisement.
These practices began in the 1840's and spread during the 1860's to encompass most of the developed world. This was the direct result of Queen Victoria's marriage to Prince Albert, his gaining control of her fortune, his involvement with German investors and industrialists, and a scheme to not only fill royal coffers, but to promote a vast expansion in the use of petroleum products, and conquer the world by quietly instituting a form of Corporate Serfdom via a process of enfranchisement --- all serving to create a modern form of Feudalism.
The caste system imposed by birth in England during the Dark and Middle Ages is exactly paralleled by its modern equivalent.
Then, we had the king, who was set apart like a lonely god, the nobility used as extensions of the king's power as his Overlords, the free men who were used as local officials to underpin the power of the nobles, and, by far, the largest class, the serfs.
Today, we have the "king" represented by a "president" who is in charge of running a "national corporation"; this is regarded as a "ship at sea" and run under Admiralty Law.
Immediately under the President we have all the "Federal" officials, especially Cabinet Officers, who act as the nobles.
Below them, we have the entire political bureaucracy represented by the lower government employees and agencies and by the CEOs of countless franchise corporations bound to the "national corporation".
Finally, we have the workers occupying the position of serfs, simply relabeled as "taxpayers" owing "allegiance" to the king as unpaid volunteer employees of the Internal Revenue Service. (See the Internal Revenue Code, Title 26, Section 1203 (b) (6).)
The promoters of this system even came up with a "Pledge of Allegiance" to further cement the obligations of this so-called "Social Contract".
The British are born into this unholy and deceitful imprisonment, but the Americans are not; this circumstance created the need to develop a surreptitious means to undermine our basic freedom from serfdom and caste systems and Admiralty Law.
This was accomplished, both in the Middle Ages and now, by a process of enrollment and registration. The baby's name is enrolled and registered as a British citizen, and from then on, his station in life is settled upon him with only a dim hope that he might rise through the ranks and become recognized for his service to the King. When the baby is old enough to make a formal personal commitment, he "pledges" his "allegiance" to the King and country, and the trap is formalized with his "consent".
Serfs retained their own tools and similar belongings as their own private property in life and were required to tithe at least 10 percent of the value of their yearly earnings to the King. Sometimes war or other bumps in the road required special purpose taxes, but these amounted to another 2% being extracted by the local Sheriffs. Modern serfs commonly pay up to sixty percent of the value of their labor to the "national corporation" running what appears to be their government.
The only other substantial difference is in the way things are labeled and the fact that the serfs are now "enfranchised", which means that they have the right to vote periodically for new ship's officers, and sometimes on issues of corporate policy; in exchange for this privilege, they subject themselves to statutory law, place all their assets in a State Trust controlled by the King and his Officers, and accept all the debts of the "national corporation".
If you were born in the British Isles or Commonwealth since the 1860's, this is the System you were born into and expected to accept and adopt without question--- indeed, you are expected to accept this pecking order and its obligations with gratitude, even though you now are less free and pay far more to government than any Medieval serf could ever imagine paying.
In America, this system was overlaid upon us using a variety of excuses of a vain and pernicious kind, mostly by pretending that the registration "laws" passed only pertained to British Tories (that is, "Territorial" citizens) living here under the Residence Act --- while at the same time broadly and purposefully misapplying these legislated Registration Acts to everyone.
All babies born in public hospitals were registered under the assumption that the British Territorial population constituted the "public" being served; as adults, the status of the victims was confirmed by undisclosed "Voter Registrations" and their enrollment under force (induction) in Federal Employee Pension programs described as "social insurance" programs, and then, the nature of their "federal employment" as "volunteer taxpayers" was also presumed upon them.
A "taxpayer" is a warrant officer in the British Merchant Marine Service, tasked with collecting taxes, tariffs and fees owed to the British King.
This system is foreign to America and no American is bound to it, but millions have been entrapped by it. When brought to task for it, the British shrug and say, you adopted this system of things voluntarily. Nobody forced you to register your car or your baby, nobody forced you to register as a voter, nobody made you sign up for Social Security or Selective Service....
But of course, they did in effect both misinform you and coerce you to "fall in line", and they didn't at any time fully disclose the nature and effect of the web of "social contracts" they were imposing on both their own citizenry and upon you, too.
They've been busily using these quasi-legal undisclosed contracts to press gang Americans and cashier American assets as collateral backing their own spending for 160 years.
So. Now, we woke up and said, "WTF?"
And in the process a lot of Brits and Aussies and Canadians have awakened, too, and they are similarly shaking the dust off their heads and saying the same thing.
The unpleasant reality, is that our own employees have abused their position of trust (a crime known as "breach of trust") and have acted under color of law to impose this web of sea-going deceit on the land and its people--- when we are owed a completely different form of law and social standing and never stepped foot on board a ship.
This is where many people get confused and think, "I'm not subject to the Law of the Sea! I never signed up to be in the Navy!"
And that is because they literally can't remember doing so. This is because they are being bound by an "unconscionable contract"
2ºNelson Peters Not everyone is as poor as you think.
We have not bought anything American for 15 years, yes - absolutely nothing.
If I happen to see "made in usa" product in stores, I will buy it, throw it away and then report that I am poisoned!
You obviously cannot understand what you have done to the world and why people hate you.
Well, not you personally but americans in general.
Take the example of Gaza because this is the topic here, that whole region is anti-US. If you go there, anything can happen to you. It is same with part of Europe where I live. You are simply not welcome.
I don't blame ordinary americans, but your Zionist authorities who sell themselves for a handful of dollars.
Get used to the new reality.
You used to be a favorite nation, now you better run away.
3ºCláudio P. Van-Dúnem there are more "Palestinians" no than 5 years ago, than 10, than 20. There is no "ethnic cleansing" taking place. Of Israel wanted that, genocide, they never would have sent ground troops in. You're just repeating hamas terrorist PR. Now, hamas and Iran have indeed called for the complete death and destruction of all Isreal and Israelis, "from the river to the sea" and done so many times, and hamas has even included such in its written charter. The Iran/hamas terrorist are the only ones calling for genocide.
And striking a house next to the Iran consolate is not the same as actually striking the consulate itself. Those RG Generals had Israeli blood on their hands, and planning more, so they were legal, legitimate targets. Iran however, was trying to kill tens of thousands of Innocent Israeli civilians with their massive are strikes. They failed not because they didn't try, but because the Israelis had much better defense and allies than Iran.
4º... Grandpa Joe, as an independent voter who once believed in you, I am horribly ashamed that, inasmuch you attack the way POTUS 45 speaks and acted , it's ok to let those who chant "Death to America" in our own backyard, and "Death to Israel" against our most faithful ally in the Middle East. You are indeed not the sharpest knife in the White House kitchen with respect to Iran. You actually remind me of POTUS 39 in his feeble attempt to please Ayatollah Khomeini, while he held 55 US hostages circa 1979. History once again repeats itself. Shame on you, Grandpa Joe.
5º-Joe Biden Selling U.S. arms supplied to Ukraine, offers to sell on darknet. Ukrainian traders claim to offer not just small arms or body armor there, but also such sophisticated hardware as Javelin and NLAW anti-tank systems or Phoenix Ghost and Switchblade explosive drones. Journalists were able to swiftly agree to the purchase of a US-made Phoenix Ghost kamikaze drone.
The said sellers through a marketplace on the darknet agreed the purchase, for a price of $4,000, of a Phoenix Ghost loitering munition, which had been developed by the US especially for the needs of the Ukrainian military.
messages with another trader, nicknamed ‘weapons Ukraine,’ who was looking to sell batches of US-made body armor at the price of $ 1,500 for five units, and M4 rifles with a silencer and a hundred bullets for $2,4000 thousand per set.
6ºSo what does Pakistan say Pakistan serves as Iran's protecting power in the United States, while Switzerland serves as the United States' protecting power in Iran. Reuters ISLAMABAD, Jan 19 (Reuters) - Pakistan expressed its willingness to work with Iran on "all issues" in a call between their foreign ministers on Friday after both countries exchanged drone and missile strikes on militant bases on each other's territory.
The tit-for-tat strikes by the two countries are the highest-profile cross-border intrusions in recent years and have raised alarm about wider instability in the region since the war between Israel and Hamas erupted on Oct. 7.
7ºTracy Marshall Both the US Secretary of Defense and Haaretz have backtracked the legitimacy of the “40 beheaded babies”, including the original writer of the column and the NY Post published an apology after hiring someone with no experience to write the story and found it wasn’t based on any evidence. I’m not a hypocrite and only care about a baby’s nationality, like you. I care about false scare tactics used on the uneducated population to make you believe bombing 35,000 innocent civilians and turning up zero evidence of “terrorists” is the norm, and it’s real affects on innocent people. But we were right about Iraq, right?
8ºRemember israel as been killing many human being ever since it's discovery , after the decline of western imperialism &, colonialism ,all those behaviors& characters of killing, demonizing, subhumanizing , people was transferred to Israel , this is why they are covering israel to the iron grab model, Can any supporting Israel tell the world which time did Iran kill any Israels on mass scale ! Non evil will showcase itself in front of the world as we now witnessing in Palestine , israel killing innocent people in order to defend itself ,did Iran kill any innocent israel in self defense ? Ask your selves this question! You can't compare Israel to the Soviet Union how many nuclear weapons did they have,but they are no more ! So let's be honest ,the West colonialism was all over Africa ,were are they