1ºCaren Pozanek we really have no idea how many changes the earth has gone through over the past 150 thousand years. I watched a history program around 10 years ago that showed the heat was so bad, it burned earth!! They found the layer,, This was in the arabian, egyptian area. and it turned areas into desert. Now, we know the poles are flipping, I think it is something like 79 thousand years ago when it happened last. That is a major impact on our climate! Prediction is that england might be the new north pole!! Volcanic activity seems to be increasing, That causes warming of the oceans and our air also. Earthquakes seem to be increasing in my area, NJ. I think pollution and chemicals cause us many problems but not so sure about this. Interesting how dems push for no petrol but ignore that research shows that ocean dumping of plastics is far worse!! They react with the salted water and release gases that are most harmful, so why have they not stopped plastic bottles? Should be easy to stop, Plastic is also in our food sources and our own bodies now, That is why I feel a lot of this is billionaires picking winners and losers.
2ºKirk McDonald oh you mean like the real climate scientist , You know the ones that claimed in the 70s we were headed for an Ice Age….  And you know the other expert, Al Gore, that not one of his predictions ever came true, and all the other predictions that the so-called experts have claimed through the decades that never came true. I for one ,want to hear from an expert ,that can tell me How the 0.4% CO2 reading in the atmosphere today ( which is relatively low ) is causing any catastrophic warming of the planet. .. you see a lot of people are really tired of hearing how every year is warmer than the previous year. They’ve been saying this at least 17 years straight. ( For example )… we will use Al Gore’s prediction since the year 2007, and from that point on we have heard, that the temperature on the planet every year has been hotter than the previous year. … I don’t know if you’re paying attention. But could you imagine, for 17 years straight, the surface temperature, or the ocean temperature, has been warmer than each previous year. ….  ( i’m sorry, but somebody is lying.) there is no way that every year is hotter than the previous year, and they’ll keep saying it every year. And people will believe this because they don’t remember how many years these predictions have been burned into their brain, you don’t have to be an expert meteorologist or climate scientist to see through the BS climate change religion that is happening. Yes, the climate is changing, as it has been on this planet, forever….to believe that we can control it, or that we are affecting the climate with its 0.4% CO2, is the biggest lie ever told, and is not science , if you are not questioning and observing all the claims that have never came about, then we are just sheep. Question everything, my friend .

3ºNeil Peart
You are really down that rabbit hole, aren't you?
Most immigrants are vaxxed. Are you?
trump let China send 3 balloons over us and did nothing.
Co ed bathrooms are subject to local laws, not federal.
If Putin takes Ukraine, he'll go after Poland next, that's WWlll. Wait til you see how expensive that will be.
There's a bill to put more border patrol agents on the border. Tell the Republicans to sign it. It's on their heads.
The republicans have the power to lock down the sanctions on Iran, but they won't.
The President can't tell private business what it can charge. We have free enterprise
4ºOwen Walsh Worth reading this book, Earth's Climate Evolution, as I have done. It's explained succinctly here by the author. He concludes: "Where are we now? Orbitally, we are still in the Little Ice Age. Solar output is no different from what it was in the 1780s in the Little Ice Age. Since 1990 it has been declining while temperature continued rising.
Only CO2 has changed a lot, rising dramatically since about 1770, due to our emissions. The associated warming has taken temperatures above the natural climate envelope of the past 2000 years. Ice cores show that whenever temperatures went 2-3°C above today’s, in association with CO2, sea level rose by 4-9m. And when CO2 went up by more than today’s levels, the ocean acidified, dissolving carbonate sediments." https://blog.geolsoc.org....climate-change/
5ºTHERE IS NOTHING GREEN ABOUT GREEN ENERGY except the DIRTY MONEY flowing into corrupt pockets
SOLAR PANELS are at best about 20% EFFICIENT. They convert almost 0% of the UV light that hits them. None of the visible spectrum and only some of the IR spectrum. At the same time as they are absorbing light they are absorbing heat from the sun. This absorbed HEAT is RADIATED INTO THE adjacent ATMOSPHERE. It should be obvious what happens next.
THERE IS NOTHING GREEN ABOUT GREEN ENERGY except the DIRTY MONEY flowing into corrupt pockets
am a retired aerospace engineer. A literal rocket scientist if you will. I worked on MX (Peacekeeper) Space Shuttle, Hubble, Brilliant Pebbles, PACOSS, Space Station, MMU, B2, the Sultan of Brunei's half billion dollar private 747 with crystal showers, gold sinks and 100 dollar a yard coiffed silk carpets. I designed a satphone installation on prince Jeffry's 757. I did all of the design work for the structure of Mark 1V propulsion module currently flying on at least 3 spacecraft that I know of. Some of the more exciting projects I have worked on are not shareable.
https://www.facebook.com/...mibextid=WC7FNe
6ºJay Corry
I dispute the people that can’t reliably tell you what the weather is gonna be tomorrow are trying to tell you what’s going to happen in 5-10 years….or what they “think” happened 100,000 years ago.
I also dispute the people that have been screaming for decades that we’re going to have an ice age (1970s), that acid rain is going to destroy the worlds food supplies (1980s), that oceans are going to rise and flood cities (1980s), that glaciers are going to melt and polar bears are going to die (1990s), to the present day hoaxers who claim all of the above as it suits them for political or monetary gain.
7ºBrian Sweeney ok what specifically do you know that scientists and NASA do not?
1. Do you dispute the physics of greenhouse gases?
2. Do you dispute that CO2 content in the atmosphere is over 400 ppm vs the goldilocks concentration of about 280 ppm humans evolved with?
3. Do you dispute that CO2, warming and Methane concentration is increasing at what appears to be an unprecedented rate?
4. Do you dispute that this increase is due to human activity?
5. Do you dispute that this increase could result in devastating consequences for civilization?
6. Do you dispute that due to many feedback loops that warming could be an exponential function?
Specifics please. Thanks.
https://science.nasa.gov/...rygoodlight.com
8ºKelly Simmons ok what specifically do you know that scientists and NASA do not?
1. Do you dispute the physics of greenhouse gases?
2. Do you dispute that CO2 content in the atmosphere is over 400 ppm vs the goldilocks concentration of about 280 ppm humans evolved with?
3. Do you dispute that CO2, warming and Methane concentration is increasing at what appears to be an unprecedented rate?
4. Do you dispute that this increase is due to human activity?
5. Do you dispute that this increase could result in devastating consequences for civilization?
6. Do you dispute that due to many feedback loops that warming could be an exponential function?
Specifics please. Thanks.
https://science.nasa.gov/...rygoodlight.com
9ºWilliam Ronald ok what specifically do you know that scientists and NASA do not?
1. Do you dispute the physics of greenhouse gases?
2. Do you dispute that CO2 content in the atmosphere is over 400 ppm vs the goldilocks concentration of about 280 ppm humans evolved with?
3. Do you dispute that CO2, warming and Methane concentration is increasing at what appears to be an unprecedented rate?
4. Do you dispute that this increase is due to human activity?
5. Do you dispute that this increase could result in devastating consequences for civilization?
6. Do you dispute that due to many feedback loops that warming could be an exponential function?
Specifics please. Thanks.
https://science.nasa.gov/...rygoodlight.com
10ºRyan Vanek ok what specifically do you know that scientists and NASA do not?
1. Do you dispute the physics of greenhouse gases?
2. Do you dispute that CO2 content in the atmosphere is over 400 ppm vs the goldilocks concentration of about 280 ppm humans evolved with?
3. Do you dispute that CO2, warming and Methane concentration is increasing at what appears to be an unprecedented rate?
4. Do you dispute that this increase is due to human activity?
5. Do you dispute that this increase could result in devastating consequences for civilization?
6. Do you dispute that due to many feedback loops that warming could be an exponential function?
Specifics please. Thanks.
https://science.nasa.gov/...rygoodlight.com