1ºhttp://www.paulstramer.ne...tice-about.html
http://www.paulstramer.ne...xplanation.html
International Public Notice: An Explanation for Everyone
https://beforeitsnews.com...eo-2612876.html
They, the British Territorial U.S. and what we believed to be "our" military, have been operating as Mercenaries, unknown to us, ever since the Civil War Conflict.
When they "won" the Second World War, we and other innocent people had to pay for rebuilding all the destruction they caused throughout the world. And they got the Bretton Woods contract.
Their private military scrip would be the so-called "World Reserve Currency" and they would provide "security" for the entire world.
What the "reserve currency status" involved was that everyone had to buy US Dollars in order to buy anything else, including essential commodities like rice and fuel oil.
So the French had to exchange their francs for USD and the Germans had to exchange their DM's -- and take the loss, and all the other countries were similarly forced to give up large supplies of their own national currencies -- before they could buy things like gasoline and rice and sow bellies.
It was a reprise of the Greenbacks bait and switch.
Give up your gold (or British Pounds Sterling or Kroner or whatever money of substance you might have) and exchange it for US asset credit, which you could then use to buy actual commodities.
It wasn't good enough for them to purloin our credit for their own use, they had to share our credit out with the rest of the world and let everyone else use it, too --- for a price.
It was the ultimate commodity rigging and monopolization scheme, set up by the so-called Central Banks, which are designed for this purpose.
That's how we wound up paying for 950 military bases all over the planet.
That's how we still pay all but four percent (4%) of all defense costs for Western Europe, Japan, and the Commonwealth and much of the Middle East --- and let's not forget Britain, which went running to BRICs and is busy ingratiating itself with China and Russia, and blaming us, "the Americans" after letting its own standing military decay to 55,000.
Make no mistake, Britain engineered all the wars for profit and stiffed us with the cost every time, and now, having used us as their storefronts, they are blaming us for their own grotesque war profiteering and reckless violence and theft and criminality.
And lies.
Let everyone remember the video footage of George Herbert Walker Bush, Generals Schwarzkopf and Powell, and Henry Kissinger being knighted by Queen Elizabeth II and put together 2 + 2, and what do you get?
Where do you think "Q" got its name from?
Why do you think JFK's Memorial is encircled by a driveway in the shape of a Q that you can see from space, if the Queen's Secret Service didn't kill him?
Who do you think is working against us now? And always?
Who were we fighting in The War of Independence?
The War of 1812?
And on the Home Front ever since?
Who was Abraham Lincoln working for?
Why was he "President" of the United States of America, Incorporated, a British Crown Corporation?
Why is the British Territorial "Congress" that acts as a Board of Directors for the self-same corporation voting to spend $61 Billion dollars worth of our credit, on a failed proxy war in the Ukraine?
And dancing around like imbeciles waving our abused Title IV Flag as they do this?
That flag was allocated to our British Territorial Subcontractors when and if they were exercising our delegated powers in time of war, but there has been no actual war, just bloody mercenary conflict after mercenary conflict after mercenary conflict.
So they have abused our flag under color of war, just as they have abused us under color of law.
Now, Putin is doing unto them what they have been doing to Russia and the rest of the world and they are amazed. How can this be?
The Central Banks can read the tea leaves and they are changing horses, after they rode us into the dirt.
It's simple enough. The Military Geniuses let SERCO, a British Municipal Corporation, function as their Paymaster.
They let their most bitter enemy hold their purse-strings.
Now their erstwhile business partners, the Central Banks, are on the run, passing off our money, which isn't theirs to begin with, as payola to Putin.
Someone always pays, and in this case, it's us, again.
Those banks don't have any money -- actual assets or credit either one, that is their own.
As MEP Godfrey Bloom so succinctly and elegantly explained, all the banks are broke by nature, by design, through the practice of fractional reserve banking. They own neither the assets being traded nor the credit, yet they have contrived to use other people's money and credit to pay their own bills, and they have left the actual owners enslaved to Odious Debt.
An Odious Debt is a debt created by some means of fraud, of which the victims have no knowledge, and do not benefit from.
Like the unconscionable U.S. Citizen contracts they foisted off on us via our Mothers' signatures on undisclosed agreements imposed under color of law, then had their own Uniformed Officers, Medical Doctors, that they illegally and unlawfully licensed, witness and countersign "the receipts" of the "deposits" going into the Depository Trust Corporation "clearinghouse" as new assets of the British Crown.
It's no mistake that the Medical Doctors have again been weaponized and used in the recent phony pandemic, too.
Generations of Americans have labored under the burden of two (2) foreign and fraudulent citizenships, unaware of the legal con game being exercised against them by people they trusted, their own public employees, who were at the same time, taking their paychecks out of their pockets.
2ºWait a minute I am so confused. I thought women were equal to man? Women are so powerful they have to wait 20 yrs when there is no proof just their words! Every freaking guy should be worried about this BS! MeTooLadies start growing some ! Half the crap I don’t even believe anymore! What this idiot waiting for? I Hope Dr. Ford can help her or the Bill Cosby dingbats or the Harvey Weinstein ding dongs can help! Enough is enough you women are either equals or you not! And please don’t get on here and say how unsympathetic I am , I could care less.
3ºThis is a brave and shocking personal statement. Christine Clark's choices and her public candor demonstrate her strength and honesty. She chose to hide an experience, both perhaps to protect her privacy and because she felt it did not affect her ability to hold office. However, by choosing to disclose this information now, she has demonstrated her commitment to transparency and honesty, as well as her respect for duty and professional ethics. Such openness and candor will help to build trust and send an important message to society that anyone can be a victim of violence and can find strength and growth in past setbacks.
4ºLisa Trinemeyer
1) You don’t know if she was convicted or not….though an arrest only is likely since crimes of violence usualiy cannot be expunged; but it is unclear what she was arrested for. If you have information from another source then please share.
2) as an expert myself, I challenge the assertion that victims are “often” arrested. That is patently absurd. What expert said this? Domestic violence laws however are very often extreme and, believe it or not, allow for arrests without probable cause (or rather the threshold is drastically reduced). It is NOT “often” that victims are arrested, What a ridiculous assertion!! Show me the data this is based upon! Who said this!
5ºThis statement from Kristen Clarke (R-Calif.) is truly remarkable. Her choice not to disclose her past domestic violence victimization during the Senate confirmation process as head of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice has sparked some controversy and concern. Such a decision may have been made for a variety of reasons, including personal privacy concerns and the possible fear that such information could be used to attack her professional competence and credibility. Regardless of the reasons for her decision, this choice highlights the issue of the delicate balance between dealing with an individual's privacy and the public's rights in the public sphere.
6ºGrizell Johnson “and that it is being concealed from the public”
We are discussing crimes that are being hidden and concealed. You just gave me examples of people being openly accused and in the public eye and they have denied the allegations. I too can provide example of accusations that are made public. Did you think that is what I was asking you to provide? We are discussing someone with an expunged record and lied about ir and you suggested Senators abuse women (as some sort of defense or rebuttal) and that it is deliberately hidden from the public. I am unaware of any senator with an expunged crime that has been concealed.
7ºDanny Slayter
who are you even talking to???
you have just COMPLETELY lost the thread here. Spun out into a TOTAL fantasy land.
because someone said you're WRONG (about whether DV cases can be prosecuted without cooperating victims)
(and you are completely embarrassingly and verifiably wrong)
you have NOT just imagined yourself SUPERIOR
you have completely invented an ENEMY to DOMINATE....
that you're imagining as A.CHILD. (huge fyi)
rather than simply accepting the REALITY (that DV cases CAN be prosecuted without cooperative victims)
are you PROUD of your fantasy?
do you need some private time to "celebrate " ???