Supreme Court takes up religious liberty dispute on foster care and same-sex marriage

The Supreme Court agreed Monday to hear an appeal by a Catholic foster agency that argues it's in danger of losing its government contract because it refuses to recruit or certify same-sex couples as potential foster parents.


Since they have okayed homosexual "marriage" I guess next they will okay this filth n perversion also.
No child should be allowed to be raised n a perverted n filthy homosexuality lifestyle.
They wouldn't take them to church bc they already know that their lifestyle is wrong...
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

They are also of a reprobate mind...n surely don't need to pervert little minds.

Romans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

So next I'll be getting:

Don't judge me
God's not real
Bible is a fairytale
Heaven/hell isn't real
Bible was written by man
In 3...2...1

Okay I am going to really try here and hope that people also try to grasp what is actually happening.
Let's say that an adoption agency opened that specialized in finding vegetarian families who wanted to adopt and working with them
This group is tremendously successful and getting lots of kids placed, but some meat-eaters go there for their services and get told " no we only work with people who are willing to live vegetarian tenets' but there are many other places, including the state, which will help the meat-eaters with these services.
The meat-eaters sue and the agency is told they have to either work with meat eaters also or shut down.
Well, you are asking them to go against a big part of their belief system and why they went into the services to begin with. The agency shuts down.

(now, I know there is no constitutional right to vegetarianism. But even so, the agency has a right to its beliefs. I don't agree or aspire to them, but I don't think they should be forced to shut down and I certainly don't think the government should force people to do work against their will and fundamental beliefs!)
Beware, A government that can force one person to do work against their beliefs can force you to also