20 Comments
Shane A. Callcut NO ONE is trying to fully close the border. No one is isolating themselves. I'm fully accepting of that. We aren't talking about Ports of Entries and avacados. It's about the extreme porus border all along the border. The millions of illegal immigrants that are know that as soon as they are "caught" they get released with a court summons and shipped to the destination of their choice. Vast majority do not have a legitimate asylum claim. There is minimal vetting and those are the ones who actual get caught. How many more just slipped through? Why do you assume that all of those crossing have good intentions?
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704520
----------------------
Matt Linville Failure trump took his fraud case to over 60 courts, including the Supreme Court. He lost all of them, most due to lack of evidence. He took his fraud case to the states and asked for recounts in several states. They did recounts in several states, including multiple recounts in at least two states. He lost all of them as well. At this point trump is the biggest loser in American history, and there is absolutely no evidence that supports your claim that voter fraud exists. Failure trump tried to prove it, and failed. Mike Lindell tried to prove it and failed. In fact several attorneys associated with failure trump are (a) pleading guilty and working with authorities against trump, (b) losing their license to practice law, (c) potentially being disbarred.
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704527
----------------------
Gina Dunn Texas has a very large population of Hispanic for many many years. You fail to see my point. Apparently you think only Hispanic are targeted for illegal immigrants checks. You see things threw a jaded eye. Most law enforcement and elected officials in southern Texas are Hispanics and they are against what's happening also because they and their family's did things legally. Get off you racist high horse. A large group of Chinese nationals were targeted just last week. 50 Russian we caught 100 miles from the border with ties to the Russian mob. But thanks for your one sided opinion of the border crisis. That is the bottom line.
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704514
----------------------
illegal alien families in New York City will receive more assistance than US Military families. New York City Mayor Eric Adams plans to pilot prepaid debit cards to 500 illegal migrant families who have already received a voucher to stay in select hotels for 28 days — credit cards which can be used at illegal migrants’
leisure for up to $10,000 each in taxpayer money with no ID check and no fraud control. Then there is the American service member — who not only obeys the rule of law but puts his or her life on the line to protect it and our way of life. How is it that in New York, illegal migrants receive better compensation than American service members do while deployed overseas?
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704513
----------------------
Joe Spyak
The U.S hasn't had a closed border policy.
Implementing a complete and prolonged closed border policy in the United States would likely strain diplomatic relations with other countries. International diplomacy heavily relies on open borders and the ability to facilitate movement and interaction between nations. Here are a few reasons why a closed border policy could strain diplomatic relations:
1. Reciprocity: If the U.S. were to close its borders, it could prompt other countries to respond with similar measures, leading to a breakdown in international travel, trade, and cooperation. Closed borders could disrupt diplomatic channels and hinder the exchange of diplomats, officials, and delegations between nations.
2. Economic impact: Closed borders would have a significant impact on global trade and economic relations. Restricting the movement of goods and services across borders could disrupt supply chains and negatively affect economies, leading to potential trade disputes and strained economic ties with other countries.
3. Humanitarian concerns: Closed borders may hinder the ability to provide humanitarian aid and assistance during times of crisis or natural disasters. The international community often collaborates and coordinates efforts to provide support in such situations, and closed borders could impede these efforts, potentially straining relationships with countries in need.
4. Diplomatic reciprocity: Diplomatic relations are built on the principle of reciprocity, where countries expect to have similar access and treatment for their citizens in return. A closed border policy could be perceived as a violation of this principle, leading to strained relations and potential retaliatory measures from other nations.
5. Global cooperation: In an increasingly interconnected world, many global challenges, such as climate change, terrorism, and pandemics, require international collaboration and cooperation. Closed borders could hinder the ability to address these issues collectively, potentially damaging diplomatic relations and impeding effective solutions.
It is important to maintain open lines of communication, cooperation, and engagement with other countries to foster positive diplomatic relations. While border security and immigration policies are within a country's sovereign right, a complete closed border policy would likely have significant diplomatic repercussions.
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704532
----------------------
Chris Tee
I agree with you that our borders absolutely need reinforcing to prevent illegal crossings.
A legitimate claim for asylum in the United States is based on the fear of persecution in one's home country due to certain protected characteristics or circumstances. To be eligible for asylum, an individual must meet the following criteria:
1. Well-founded Fear: The individual must have a well-founded fear of persecution if they were to return to their home country. This persecution can be based on their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.
2. Government Involvement: The persecution must be carried out by the government or by individuals or groups that the government is unable or unwilling to control.
3. Past or Future Persecution: The individual must have either experienced persecution in the past or have a credible fear of future persecution.
4. Non-Affiliation with Persecutors: The individual cannot have participated in or been responsible for the persecution they fear.
It is important to note that seeking asylum is a legal process, and each case is evaluated on an individual basis. The specific requirements and eligibility criteria can be complex and may be subject to interpretation.
Additionally, it is recommended that individuals seeking asylum in the United States consult with an experienced immigration attorney or seek assistance from qualified organizations that specialize in asylum matters to ensure proper understanding of the process and to provide appropriate legal support.
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704521
----------------------
Securing the southern border of the United States presents a complex array of challenges that span technological, infrastructural, human, legal, and policy dimensions. These challenges are multifaceted, involving not only the physical security of the border but also addressing the humanitarian, economic, and political issues that intersect with border security efforts. The main challenges in securing the southern border include:
### Technological and Infrastructural Challenges
- **Deployment of Surveillance Technology**: While significant progress has been made in deploying surveillance technology along the southwest U.S. border, including radars, sensors, and cameras, there are ongoing needs to assess the performance of these technologies and fully implement recommendations to enhance their effectiveness[5].
- **Infrastructure Management**: The U.S. Border Patrol utilizes a suite of technology and infrastructure assets, including autonomous capabilities, to detect and identify threats. However, securing every mile of diverse terrain requires a balance of technology, infrastructure, and personnel tailored to each specific area[3].
- **Border Barrier and Tactical Infrastructure**: The construction and maintenance of physical barriers, such as fencing, roads, and lighting, support agents' ability to respond to illicit cross-border activities. However, CBP has not developed metrics to systematically assess the contributions of border fencing to its mission[5].
### Human and Personnel Challenges
- **Staffing Shortages**: Achieving a staffing level of 21,370 agents, the statutorily-established minimum, has been a challenge, with the Border Patrol reporting about 19,400 agents as of September 2017. Staffing shortages impact the optimal deployment of activities[5].
- **Training and Retention**: The hiring, training, and retention of agents present both challenges and opportunities. The Border Patrol Academy in Artesia, New Mexico, has increased its capacity to meet training demands, but ongoing efforts are needed to ensure adequate staffing levels[1].
### Legal and Policy Challenges
- **Outdated Immigration Laws**: The U.S. faces challenges related to outdated immigration laws and recent court rulings that have created loopholes in the U.S. immigration system. These legal challenges contribute to the complexity of securing the border[18].
- **Asylum Process and Humanitarian Concerns**: Balancing the enforcement of border security with the need to respect the dignity of migrants and provide for their humanitarian needs is a significant challenge. This includes improving processing, sheltering, and medical care at CBP and ICE facilities[15].
### Economic and Political Challenges
- **Economic Factors**: Economic conditions in Central and South America, natural disasters fueled by climate change, and a general lack of security drive migration towards the U.S. border. Addressing the root causes of migration requires a comprehensive approach that goes beyond border security measures[9].
- **Political Divisions**: Political divisions over border security strategies, including the construction of a border wall and the deployment of military personnel, complicate efforts to secure the border. These divisions impact the allocation of resources and the implementation of policies[7].
In summary, securing the southern border involves addressing a wide range of challenges that require coordinated efforts across technological, infrastructural, human, legal, and policy domains. Effective border security strategies must balance the need for security with humanitarian concerns and address the root causes of migration.
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704524
----------------------
Jack King
The proof that the U.S. is adhering to and enforcing immigration laws can be found through various sources and indicators. Here are some ways that demonstrate the government's commitment to enforcing immigration laws:
1. Legal Framework: The U.S. has a comprehensive set of immigration laws, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which outlines the legal basis for immigration enforcement. The existence of these laws demonstrates the government's intent to enforce immigration regulations.
2. Government Agencies: The U.S. has dedicated agencies responsible for immigration enforcement, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). These agencies engage in activities that involve enforcing immigration laws, such as border control, visa processing, and removal operations.
3. Apprehensions and Detentions: The government publishes data on apprehensions and detentions of individuals who violate immigration laws. These statistics provide evidence of the government's enforcement actions and efforts to address unauthorized entry or stay in the country.
4. Removals and Deportations: The U.S. government carries out removal and deportation proceedings against individuals who are found to be in violation of immigration laws. The annual reports published by ICE provide insights into the number of removals and deportations conducted by the government.
5. Workplace Audits: The government conducts audits and investigations to ensure compliance with immigration laws in workplaces. This includes verifying employment eligibility and penalizing employers who violate regulations related to hiring unauthorized workers.
6. Border Security Measures: The implementation of border security measures, such as border patrol, surveillance technologies, and physical barriers, demonstrates the government's commitment to enforcing immigration laws and securing the border.
7. Judicial System: The U.S. courts play a critical role in enforcing immigration laws. Judicial review of immigration cases helps ensure that immigration laws are applied correctly and fairly.
It is important to note that the enforcement of immigration laws can be a complex and multifaceted process, and the government's approach may vary depending on factors such as available resources, policy priorities, and political considerations. Publicly available reports, statistics, and government statements can provide insights into the government's efforts to enforce immigration laws.
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704522
----------------------
Joe Spyak
The impact of illegal immigration on the U.S. economy is a complex and debated topic. While there are differing opinions, it is important to consider multiple perspectives and studies. Here are some key points to consider:
1. Labor market: Some argue that undocumented immigrants may have a negative impact on certain segments of the labor market by potentially competing with native-born workers for jobs, particularly those in low-skilled sectors. However, other studies suggest that they can also fill labor gaps and contribute to economic growth by taking jobs that are difficult to fill or creating new businesses.
2. Tax contributions: Undocumented immigrants, like any other workers, often pay taxes through various means, including income taxes, sales taxes, and property taxes (indirectly through rent payments). The Social Security Administration estimates that undocumented immigrants contribute billions of dollars to Social Security and Medicare through payroll taxes, even though they are generally ineligible for benefits.
3. Fiscal impact: Assessing the overall fiscal impact of undocumented immigrants is challenging. While they may utilize certain public services, such as education and healthcare, studies suggest that their contributions generally exceed the costs associated with those services. However, estimates vary, and the fiscal impact can differ based on factors such as education level, income, and household composition.
4. Economic sectors: Certain industries, such as agriculture, construction, and hospitality, heavily rely on undocumented immigrant labor. Restricting the labor supply in these sectors could potentially lead to economic strain, affecting production and economic growth.
5. Remittances: Undocumented immigrants often send a portion of their earnings back to their home countries as remittances. While this can provide financial support to families abroad, it also represents money that is not directly circulated within the U.S. economy.
It is important to note that comprehensive immigration reform debates often seek to address issues related to undocumented immigration and find a balance between enforcement and addressing the economic contributions and wellbeing of immigrants.
In summary, assessing the economic strain of illegal immigration on the U.S. is complex, and studies offer different perspectives. The overall impact depends on various factors, including labor market dynamics, fiscal considerations, and industry-specific effects.
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704533
----------------------
New York News, Shane A. Callcut, Alice Davis, Jenny Parker, Princess Kennya, Anni Huang, Heather Zolecki, MissCathy Cooper, Donald Mohmed, Teresa Gargotta, Cajun Keith, Lance Hansen, Ron Lighthiser, Chris Smith, Gayle Evans, Michael Condee, Peter Vellutini, Michael Jeffries, Kevin Hall, Michael Santangelo, Dale B. Johnston, Jack King, Antonio Jimenez, Eric J Wright, Yorick Garcia, Drew Yorel, Lawrence Bently, Wesley Kiprop KKborus, Micheal Arnold Sr., Josh Airheart, Mark Bequette, Bola Talabi, Sonya McDaniel, Evanglebtv Ugochukwu, LengoLengo Gonza, Joshua Chamberland, Billy Cooper, Theresa Schrum, Luis Victoria, Sonny Mathias, Wayne McLaughlin, Noha Nouhaila, Tom Macdonald, ڤيولا ھازالے, Tom Jackson, Luap Sekots, Cody Cable, Jenn S Bombard, David Joseph
https://9v2yga.fisbar.com...XRnby5qcGcifQ==
Link: http://www.vin3.org/index.php?c=article&cod=357686&lang=EN#vin3Comment-1704525
----------------------